CVE-2022-36795
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn BIG-IP versions 17.0.x before 17.0.0.1, 16.1.x before 16.1.3.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.7, and 14.1.x before 14.1.5.1, when an LTM TCP profile with Auto Receive Window Enabled is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the virtual server to stop processing new client connections.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP where an LTM TCP profile with Auto Receive Window Enabled enabled on a virtual server can be crashed by specific undisclosed traffic patterns, causing the virtual server to stop accepting new client connections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, <= 17.0.0.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.7>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or view System > Software Management > Installation List in the GUI to identify the installed versionAffected if Version falls within 14.1.0 to 14.1.5.0, 15.1.0 to 15.1.6, 16.1.0 to 16.1.3.0, or 17.1.0 to 17.1.0.0 (any version before the fixed releases)
-
Identify TCP profiles with Auto Receive Window EnabledRun 'tmsh list ltm profile tcp all properties include autoReceiveWindow' or navigate to Local Traffic > Profiles > TCP in the GUI and inspect each profile for the Auto Receive Window Enabled settingAffected if Any LTM TCP profile has Auto Receive Window Enabled set to Enabled (checked)
-
Check which virtual servers use affected TCP profilesRun 'tmsh list ltm virtual all' and examine the 'profiles' section of each virtual server to see if it references a TCP profile with Auto Receive Window Enabled, or use the GUI at Local Traffic > Virtual Servers to view profile associationsAffected if A virtual server is using a TCP profile where Auto Receive Window Enabled is turned on
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is less than the fixed releases (14.1.5.1+, 15.1.7+, 16.1.3.1+, 17.0.0.1+) AND you have any virtual server using a TCP profile with Auto Receive Window Enabled enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.1.5.115.1.716.1.3.1
Apply the vendor-supplied patches: upgrade to 17.0.0.1+, 16.1.3.1+, 15.1.7+, or 14.1.5.1+ depending on the deployed version line. Alternatively, identify and modify TCP profiles with Auto Receive Window Enabled to disable that feature until patching is possible.
14.1.5.1, 15.1.7, 16.1.3.1, or 17.0.0.1 (or later stable releases within each respective major version branch)
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP version by checking the system information in the web management console or via command line (tmsh show sys version).
- 2. Identify which BIG-IP modules (LTM, APM, AFM, Analytics, AAM, ASM, DNS, FPS, GTM) are in use and their versions.
- 3. Verify that any virtual servers are configured with an LTM TCP profile that has Auto Receive Window Enabled.
- 4. Plan maintenance window for upgrade as this may require brief service interruption.
- 5. Download the appropriate fixed version from F5 Networks support portal: 14.1.5.1 for 14.1.x, 15.1.7 for 15.1.x, 16.1.3.1 for 16.1.x, or 17.0.0.1 for 17.0.x.
- 6. Follow F5 upgrade documentation to apply the update, ensuring proper backup of configuration before proceeding.
- 7. After upgrade, verify that virtual servers with Auto Receive Window Enabled TCP profiles are processing connections normally.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36795 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36795 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data