CVE-2022-3682
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in the SDM600 file permission validation. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability by gaining access to the system and uploading a specially crafted message to the system node, which could result in Arbitrary code Executing. This issue affects: All SDM600 versions prior to version 1.2 FP3 HF4 (Build Nr. 1.2.23000.291) List of CPEs: * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.9002.257:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.10002.257:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.11002.149:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.12002.222:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.13002.72:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.44:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.92:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.108:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.182:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.257:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.342:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.447:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.481:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.506:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.14002.566:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.20000.3174:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.21000.291:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.21000.931:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.21000.105:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:sdm600:1.2.23000.291:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA file permission validation vulnerability exists in Hitachi Energy SDM600. An authenticated attacker with system access can upload a specially crafted message to a system node, bypassing file permission checks and achieving arbitrary code execution. This affects all versions prior to 1.2 FP3 HF4 (Build 1.2.23000.291).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.0, < 1.3.0.1339CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SDM600 software versionLocate the installed version of SDM600 through the product's system information page, about dialog, or version check command provided in the product documentationAffected if The installed version falls within >= 1.0 and < 1.3.0.1339 (or is earlier than Build 1.2.23000.291)
-
Confirm file upload capability is enabledInspect the SDM600 configuration settings or system features to determine whether the message upload functionality to system nodes is accessibleAffected if File/message upload to system nodes is permitted and accessible to the user account in question
-
Verify authentication controlsReview access control settings and user privilege configurations to determine if low-privilege or external authenticated users can access the systemAffected if Authenticated users with limited privileges can reach the system upload functionality
-
Check network exposureExamine network configuration to determine if SDM600 management interface is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The system is reachable from networks outside the trusted administrative zone
The environment is affected if SDM600 version is below 1.3.0.1339 (or Build 1.2.23000.291) and the file upload feature to system nodes is accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.0.1339
Upgrade SDM600 to version 1.2 FP3 HF4 (Build Nr. 1.2.23000.291) or later. Until patched, limit system access to trusted personnel and implement network segmentation to reduce attack surface.
1.2 FP3 HF4 (Build Nr. 1.2.23000.291) or later
- Obtain the fixed version of SDM600 (version 1.2 FP3 HF4 with Build Nr. 1.2.23000.291 or later) from the official Hitachi Energy support portal at search.abb.com
- Review the SDM600 upgrade documentation and release notes for version 1.2 FP3 HF4
- Ensure proper backup of the current SDM600 configuration and data
- Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades may require system downtime
- Apply the upgrade following Hitachi Energy's documented installation procedure for SDM600 firmware
- After upgrade, verify that the file permission validation vulnerability has been addressed by confirming the version number in the system
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-3682 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-3682 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data