Openshift DeployerApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2022-36909

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-07-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A missing permission check in Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to check for the existence of an attacker-specified file path on the Jenkins controller file system and to upload a SSH key file from the Jenkins controller file system to an attacker-specified URL.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins OpenShift Deployer Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier lacks permission checks on certain endpoints, allowing any user with Overall/Read permission to probe for file existence on the Jenkins controller filesystem and to exfiltrate SSH key files to attacker-controlled URLs. This is a classic missing authorization check vulnerability where the plugin fails to enforce appropriate access controls on file operations.

MitigationUpgrade to OpenShift Deployer Plugin version 1.3.0 or later which implements proper permission checks. Until then, restrict Overall/Read permission to only trusted users and consider disabling the plugin if not needed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Openshift DeployerApplication
Affected:<= 1.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify OpenShift Deployer Plugin is installed
    Navigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed, or use the Jenkins CLI: java -jar jenkins-cli.jar list-plugins | grep -i openshift
    Affected if The OpenShift Deployer plugin appears in the installed plugins list
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In Manage Plugins > Installed, find the OpenShift Deployer plugin and note the version number shown in the version column
    Affected if The version is 1.2.0 or earlier
  3. Review users with Overall/Read permission
    Navigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Users, then check Matrix Authorization Strategy under Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security to see which users or groups have Overall/Read permission
    Affected if Any untrusted or anonymous users have Overall/Read permission enabled
  4. Audit plugin configuration for SSH key paths
    Inspect the OpenShift Deployer plugin configuration at Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Configure System > OpenShift Deployer, looking for configured SSH key file paths
    Affected if SSH key file paths are configured and the plugin version is vulnerable
  5. Check for suspicious outbound network behavior
    Review Jenkins controller logs and network traffic for connections from Jenkins to unexpected external IP addresses or URLs, which could indicate exfiltration attempts
    Affected if Outbound connections to unknown external URLs are observed in logs or network logs

A user is affected if the OpenShift Deployer plugin version is 1.2.0 or earlier AND untrusted users have Overall/Read permission enabled in Jenkins.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.2.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to OpenShift Deployer Plugin version 1.3.0 or later which implements proper permission checks. Until then, restrict Overall/Read permission to only trusted users and consider disabling the plugin if not needed.

Fix this in Openshift Deployer Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,680
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,288.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36909 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36909 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data