CVE-2022-36956
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Veritas NetBackup, the NetBackup Client allows arbitrary command execution from any remote host that has access to a valid host-id NetBackup certificate/private key from the same domain. The affects 9.0.x through 9.0.0.1 and 9.1.x through 9.1.0.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceVeritas NetBackup Client versions 9.0.x through 9.0.0.1 and 9.1.x through 9.1.0.1 contain a vulnerability allowing arbitrary command execution from any remote host possessing a valid host-id NetBackup certificate/private key from the same domain. An attacker with network access and a compromised certificate can execute commands with the privileges of the NetBackup Client service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 9.1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NetBackup Client versionRun command: 'nbc.exe -version' or check Windows Services for NetBackup services and look at file version of installation binaries in Program Files/Veritas/NetBackup/bin, or query registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Veritas\NetBackup\CurrentVersionAffected if Installed version is 9.0.x through 9.0.0.1 or 9.1.x through 9.1.0.1 (specifically 9.0, 9.0.0.0, 9.0.0.1 and 9.1.0.0, 9.1.0.1)
-
Verify NetBackup services are runningCheck if nbars, nbemm, or nbptm services are running via 'sc query' or Services.msc; these services accept remote connections when activeAffected if NetBackup Client services are running and listening for remote connections on ports such as 13782 or 1556
-
Confirm certificate-based authentication is in useCheck for presence of host-id certificates in the NetBackup certificate storage directory (typically /usr/openv/netbackup/var/hostID/ or C:\Program Files\Veritas\NetBackup\var\hostID\) and verify certificate validity dates have not expiredAffected if Valid, non-expired NetBackup host-id certificates exist on the system (an attacker with compromised certificate from same domain could exploit this)
-
Assess network exposure of NetBackup portsRun 'netstat -an | findstr "13782 13722 1556"' to see which NetBackup ports are listening on external interfaces rather than only localhostAffected if NetBackup ports are bound to non-localhost addresses (0.0.0.0 or external IP) allowing remote network access
System is affected if running a vulnerable NetBackup Client version (9.0.x-9.0.0.1 or 9.1.x-9.1.0.1) with active services and network-exposed ports, especially if valid certificates from the same domain are present and could be compromised.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches for NetBackup 9.0.x and 9.1.x per the official security advisory. Until patched, enforce strict certificate/key lifecycle management, restrict network access to NetBackup infrastructure, and monitor for unauthorized certificate usage.
Upgrade to NetBackup version 9.1.0.2 or later (or the latest available stable release)
- 1. Identify all NetBackup clients and servers running affected versions (9.0.x through 9.0.0.1 and 9.1.x through 9.1.0.1) in the environment
- 2. Review Veritas Support website (www.veritas.com) for the specific patch or fixed release for CVE-2022-36956
- 3. Prioritize upgrading NetBackup clients first, as they are the vulnerable component
- 4. Before upgrading in production, test the upgrade in a non-production environment
- 5. Schedule maintenance window for the upgrade
- 6. Backup current NetBackup configuration
- 7. Upgrade NetBackup clients to the fixed version
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful and client connectivity is restored
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36956 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36956 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data