CVE-2022-36973
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Ivanti Avalanche 6.3.2.3490. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the ProfileDaoImpl class. A crafted request can trigger execution of SQL queries composed from a user-supplied string. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-15329.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the ProfileDaoImpl class of Ivanti Avalanche allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by crafting malicious SQL queries through user-supplied input. Despite the description indicating authentication is required, the SQL injection enables attackers to circumvent the authentication mechanism entirely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.3.2.3490, < 6.3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Ivanti Avalanche installationIdentify if Ivanti Avalanche is installed on the system by checking for the Avalanche application directory, service, or running processAffected if Ivanti Avalanche software is present on the system
-
Check installed versionLocate the Ivanti Avalanche version information, typically found in the application properties, about dialog, or version file within the Avalanche installation directoryAffected if The installed version is 6.3.2.3490 or higher but lower than 6.3.4
-
Identify exposed management interfaceCheck network configuration to determine if the Ivanti Avalanche management console (typically ports 80/443 or configured HTTP/HTTPS ports) is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The management interface is accessible from network segments that include untrusted or external hosts
-
Locate ProfileDaoImpl class fileSearch for the ProfileDaoImpl class file within the Avalanche application directories, typically found in WEB-INF/classes or similar application library pathsAffected if The ProfileDaoImpl class file exists in the application, indicating the vulnerable component is present
-
Review authentication logs for anomaliesExamine Ivanti Avalanche server logs, especially authentication and database query logs, for unusual SQL syntax or authentication patterns that may indicate exploitation attemptsAffected if Log entries show SQL injection patterns in authentication parameters or unexpected authentication bypasses
The environment is affected if Ivanti Avalanche version 6.3.2.3490 through 6.3.3.x is installed and its management interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.3.4
Apply vendor security patch for CVE-2022-36973 when available; until then, restrict network access to Ivanti Avalanche management interfaces and implement WAF rules to detect SQL injection attempts.
Ivanti Avalanche 6.3.4
- Obtain Ivanti Avalanche version 6.3.4 from the official Ivanti download portal or your licensed distribution channel
- Back up the current Avalanche configuration and database before proceeding with the upgrade
- Upgrade the Ivanti Avalanche installation to version 6.3.4 using the standard upgrade procedure
- After upgrade, verify that the ProfileDaoImpl class has been updated and test that authentication functions correctly
- Confirm the SQL injection vulnerability is no longer present by reviewing system logs for any previously exploited SQL injection attempts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36973 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36973 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data