CVE-2022-3699
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA privilege escalation vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo HardwareScanPlugin prior to version 1.3.1.2 and Lenovo Diagnostics prior to version 4.45 that could allow a local user to execute code with elevated privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA local privilege escalation vulnerability in Lenovo HardwareScanPlugin (prior to 1.3.1.2) and Lenovo Diagnostics (prior to 4.45) allows an authenticated local user to execute arbitrary code with elevated SYSTEM or administrator privileges. The diagnostic software runs with higher privileges and contains a flaw enabling a local attacker to escalate their privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.45.0< 2.4.1.1< 1.3.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Lenovo Diagnostics versionOpen Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl) or check the installation directory typically at C:\Program Files\Lenovo\Lenovo Diagnostics\ and locate the main executable file properties to view version, or check registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\Lenovo Diagnostics for Version valueAffected if Version is present and less than 4.45.0
-
Check Lenovo HardwareScanPlugin versionCheck the installation directory typically at C:\Program Files\Lenovo\HardwareScanPlugin\ for the plugin executable file properties to view version, or check registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\HardwareScanPlugin for VersionAffected if Version is present and less than 1.3.1.2
-
Check Lenovo Hardwarescan Addin versionCheck the installation directory typically at C:\Program Files\Lenovo\HardwareScan Addin\ for the addin executable file properties to view version, or check registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\HardwareScan Addin for VersionAffected if Version is present and less than 2.4.1.1
-
Identify running diagnostic services with elevated privilegesOpen Services (services.msc) and look for Lenovo diagnostic services running with SYSTEM or administrator privileges, or use command 'sc query type= service' and 'sc qc <service_name>' to check the binary path and startup typeAffected if Any Lenovo diagnostic service is installed and runs with elevated privileges while the version is below the fixed releases
If any of the three affected Lenovo software components are installed with a version below 4.45.0 (Diagnostics), 1.3.1.2 (HardwareScanPlugin), or 2.4.1.1 (HardwareScan Addin) and the software runs with elevated privileges, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.1.22.4.1.14.45.0
Update Lenovo HardwareScanPlugin to version 1.3.1.2 or later and Lenovo Diagnostics to version 4.45 or later. Deploy via enterprise patch management tools and verify successful installation.
Diagnostics >= 4.45.0 | HardwareScan Plugin >= 1.3.1.2 | HardwareScan Addin >= 2.4.1.1
- Identify which Lenovo component is installed: Diagnostics, Hardwarescan Addin, or Hardwarescan Plugin
- For Lenovo Diagnostics: Upgrade to version 4.45.0 or later
- For Lenovo HardwareScan Plugin: Upgrade to version 1.3.1.2 or later
- For Lenovo HardwareScan Addin: Upgrade to version 2.4.1.1 or later
- Obtain the updated versions from the official Lenovo support website (support.lenovo.com)
- Apply the update following Lenovo's standard installation procedures
- Verify the installed version matches the fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-3699 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-3699 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data