Opc Ua C\+\+ Demo ServerApplication · Unified Automation

CVE-2022-37013

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-03-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to create a denial-of-service condition on affected installations of Unified Automation OPC UA C++ Demo Server 1.7.6-537 [with vendor rollup]. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of certificates. A crafted certificate can force the server into an infinite loop. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to create a denial-of-service condition on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-17203.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A remote unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability in Unified Automation OPC UA C++ Demo Server 1.7.6-537 allows attackers to send a crafted certificate that triggers an infinite loop in the certificate handling logic, causing the server to become unresponsive.

MitigationApply vendor security updates or patches for the OPC UA C++ Demo Server; implement network-level certificate validation and rate limiting as interim workarounds.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Opc Ua C\+\+ Demo ServerApplication
Affected:= 1.7.6.537

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed version of OPC UA C++ Demo Server
    Locate the server binary or check its product information. Common ways: running 'DemoServer --version', checking the executable properties, or reviewing the application documentation. On Windows, right-click the executable and view 'Details' tab. On Linux, use 'file DemoServer' or check installed package metadata.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.7.6.537
  2. Verify certificate handling is enabled
    Check the server configuration files (typically XML or config files in the server installation directory) for certificate-related settings. Look for settings like 'CertificateStore', 'CertificateValidation', or 'SecurityPolicy' configurations that enable certificate-based authentication.
    Affected if Certificate handling is enabled in the server configuration - the vulnerability triggers when processing certificates
  3. Confirm the server is network-accessible
    Check if the OPC UA server process is listening on network ports (default OPC UA ports are 4840, or configurable). Use 'netstat -an | grep 4840' or similar commands to see if the server is bound to a network interface.
    Affected if The server is exposed to network connections - the CVE allows remote unauthenticated attackers to send crafted certificates

You are affected if your installed OPC UA C++ Demo Server is version 1.7.6.537, certificate handling is enabled, and the server is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor security updates or patches for the OPC UA C++ Demo Server; implement network-level certificate validation and rate limiting as interim workarounds.

Fix this in Opc Ua C\+\+ Demo Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-37013 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-37013 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data