CVE-2022-37681
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHitachi Kokusai Electric Newtork products for monitoring system (Camera, Decoder and Encoder) and below allows attckers to perform a directory traversal via a crafted GET request to the endpoint /ptippage.cgi. Security information ID hitachi-sec-2022-001 contains fixes for the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDirectory traversal vulnerability in Hitachi Kokusai Electric network monitoring products (Camera, Decoder, Encoder) allows remote attackers to access arbitrary files via crafted GET requests containing path traversal sequences (../) to the /ptippage.cgi endpoint. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.07CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the product modelAccess the device web interface or check the device label/documentation to confirm the exact model number (e.g., Hitachi Hc Ip9100hd) and confirm it is a network camera, decoder, or encoder from Hitachi Kokusai Electric.Affected if The device is a Hitachi Hc Ip9100hd network monitoring device or related product from Hitachi Kokusai Electric.
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the device admin interface and navigate to the firmware/version information page, or use the command-line interface and run 'show version' or similar command to retrieve the firmware build number.Affected if The firmware version is 1.07 or lower.
-
Verify web interface accessibilityAttempt to access the device web interface on the expected IP address using HTTP (port 80) or HTTPS (port 443) and confirm the /ptippage.cgi endpoint responds.Affected if The device web interface is exposed and the /ptippage.cgi endpoint is reachable over the network.
-
Inspect the endpoint for path traversal vulnerabilitySend a GET request to /ptippage.cgi with path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../) and observe whether the response contains file contents from outside the intended directory or returns an error indicating the traversal was processed.Affected if The /ptippage.cgi endpoint processes path traversal sequences and allows access to files outside the intended document root.
You are affected if you have a Hitachi Hc Ip9100hd device (or related camera/decoder/encoder) running firmware version 1.07 or lower with the web interface and /ptippage.cgi endpoint accessible over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch from security advisory hitachi-sec-2022-001 to affected devices. Additionally, implement input validation and sanitization on the /ptippage.cgi endpoint to reject path traversal sequences.
Firmware version greater than 1.07 (obtain exact version from hitachi-sec-2022-001)
- 1. Obtain the security advisory hitachi-sec-2022-001 from Hitachi Kokusai Electric's official security page or support portal.
- 2. Follow the remediation instructions provided in the advisory, which may include upgrading firmware to a version beyond 1.07.
- 3. Apply the firmware update according to Hitachi Kokusai's official upgrade procedures for the Hc Ip9100hd device.
- 4. After upgrading, verify that the /ptippage.cgi endpoint no longer responds to directory traversal requests.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-37681 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-37681 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data