CVE-2022-37866
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen Apache Ivy downloads artifacts from a repository it stores them in the local file system based on a user-supplied "pattern" that may include placeholders for artifacts coordinates like the organisation, module or version. If said coordinates contain "../" sequences - which are valid characters for Ivy coordinates in general - it is possible the artifacts are stored outside of Ivy's local cache or repository or can overwrite different artifacts inside of the local cache. In order to exploit this vulnerability an attacker needs collaboration by the remote repository as Ivy will issue http requests containing ".." sequences and a "normal" repository will not interpret them as part of the artifact coordinates. Users of Apache Ivy 2.0.0 to 2.5.1 should upgrade to Ivy 2.5.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Ivy is vulnerable to path traversal when downloading artifacts. The software uses user-supplied patterns with artifact coordinates (organisation, module, version) to determine local file storage locations. If these coordinates contain '../' sequences - which are valid in Ivy coordinates - an attacker can cause artifacts to be written outside the intended cache directory or overwrite unrelated cached artifacts. Exploitation requires a malicious or colluding remote repository since normal repositories don't pass '..' sequences through as artifact coordinates.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, < 2.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Ivy versionLocate the ivy JAR file in your project or installation and check its version (for example, by examining the JAR filename, running 'java -jar ivy.jar -version', or inspecting the MANIFEST.MF file inside the JAR).Affected if The version is 2.0.0 or higher but lower than 2.5.1.
-
Locate Ivy settings fileFind the ivysettings.xml file used by your build (commonly in the project root, conf directory, or referenced via the ivy.settings system property).Affected if A custom ivysettings.xml file exists that references external or untrusted repositories.
-
Review artifact pattern configurationInspect the ivysettings.xml and any ivy.xml files for artifact and resolver patterns, specifically looking for patterns that incorporate organisation, module, or version variables (for example, '${ivy.cache.dir}/[organisation]/[module]/[type]/[artifact].[ext]').Affected if Artifact patterns allow user-controlled organisation or module names to directly influence file paths without sanitization.
-
Check repository trust configurationExamine the resolver configurations in ivysettings.xml to identify which repositories are configured and whether any are external, community-hosted, or otherwise untrusted.Affected if The configuration includes external or third-party repositories that could supply malicious artifact coordinates containing '../' sequences.
-
Inspect cache directory permissionsVerify the ivy cache directory location (typically set via ivy.cache.dir in ivysettings.xml or defaulting to user home/.ivy2/cache) and check file permissions.Affected if The cache is writable and shared across untrusted users or projects.
Your environment is affected if Apache Ivy version 2.0.0 through 2.5.0 is in use AND you configure artifact patterns that incorporate untrusted repository-supplied coordinates into filesystem paths.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.5.1
Upgrade to Apache Ivy 2.5.1 or later. Additionally, review and validate that repository configurations and artifact patterns do not permit unexpected directory traversal.
Ivy 2.5.1
- Download Apache Ivy 2.5.1 from the official Apache repository (https://archive.apache.org/dist/ant/ivy/)
- Replace the existing Ivy installation with version 2.5.1
- Verify the upgrade by running 'ivy -version' and confirming it shows 2.5.1
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-37866 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-37866 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data