OpenharmonyApplication

CVE-2022-38064

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-09-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OpenHarmony-v3.1.2 and prior versions have a permission bypass vulnerability. Local attackers can bypass permission control and get sensitive information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenHarmony v3.1.2 and prior versions contain a permission bypass vulnerability that allows local attackers to circumvent access controls and obtain sensitive information. The vulnerability resides in the operating system's permission validation mechanism, enabling unprivileged local users to access protected data they should not have rights to.

MitigationApply any available security patches for OpenHarmony. If no patch is available, review and harden permission validation code paths in the affected version, ensuring all sensitive resource accesses properly validate user privileges before granting access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenharmonyApplication
Affected:>= 3.1, <= 3.1.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed OpenHarmony version
    Run the command to display the OS version (for example: 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or check system settings > about device)
    Affected if The version is 3.1, 3.1.1, or 3.1.2 (falls within >= 3.1, <= 3.1.2)
  2. Verify the permission validation component is present
    Check if the OpenHarmony permission manager service is running (for example: 'hdc shell sa dump' or review system service list)
    Affected if The permission validation service is active on a vulnerable version
  3. Confirm unprivileged local user access is possible
    Test whether a non-root or unprivileged user account on the system can access protected resources or sensitive data paths
    Affected if Unprivileged users can read or access data that should require elevated permissions
  4. Review permission validation logs for bypass attempts
    Examine system audit logs or security logs for entries indicating successful access to protected resources by users lacking proper privileges
    Affected if Logs show access grants to protected resources by unprivileged accounts

A system is affected if it runs OpenHarmony version 3.1, 3.1.1, or 3.1.2 and the permission validation mechanism allows unprivileged local users to access protected data they should not access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.1.2
Interim mitigation

Apply any available security patches for OpenHarmony. If no patch is available, review and harden permission validation code paths in the affected version, ensuring all sensitive resource accesses properly validate user privileges before granting access.

Recommended fix High confidence

OpenHarmony 3.2 or later

  1. 1. Identify all systems running OpenHarmony versions 3.1, 3.1.1, or 3.1.2
  2. 2. Plan for upgrade testing in a non-production environment first
  3. 3. Schedule maintenance window for the upgrade
  4. 4. Back up all critical data and configurations
  5. 5. Upgrade OpenHarmony to version 3.2 or later to resolve the permission bypass vulnerability
  6. 6. Verify the upgrade was successful and the vulnerability is resolved
  7. 7. Test that legitimate application functionality still works after the upgrade
Caveat Review release notes for 3.2 to check for API changes or behavioral differences that may affect existing applications

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Openharmony Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38064 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38064 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data