CVE-2022-38087
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedExposure of resource to wrong sphere in BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBIOS firmware vulnerability in Intel processors where resources are exposed to the wrong security sphere ('sphere' refers to security domains or privilege levels). A privileged local user may exploit this to obtain unauthorized information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed CPU modelRun the command 'wmic cpu get Name,ProcessorId' on Windows or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "model name"' on Linux to retrieve the processor model name.Affected if The CPU model matches any of the following: Xeon E 2314, Xeon E 2324g, Xeon E 2334, Xeon E 2336, Xeon E 2356g, Xeon E 2374g, Xeon E 2378, or Xeon E 2378g.
-
Verify the CPU familyRun 'wmic cpu get Family' on Windows or 'lscpu | grep "CPU family"' on Linux to confirm the processor belongs to the Intel Xeon E family.Affected if The CPU family indicates a Xeon E series processor matching the affected SKUs.
-
Check BIOS/firmware versionRun 'wmic bios get SMBIOSBIOSVersion' on Windows, 'dmidecode -s bios-version' on Linux, or access the BIOS setup utility during boot to view the firmware version.Affected if The system uses one of the affected CPU models (all firmware versions are vulnerable).
-
Determine local privilege contextReview local user accounts and privilege assignments using 'whoami /all' on Windows or 'id' and 'sudo -l' on Linux to determine if standard users or untrusted accounts have elevated privileges.Affected if Multiple local users exist with administrative or root privileges, or untrusted accounts have elevated access, increasing the attack surface for this privilege-escalation-style flaw.
You are affected if your system uses any of the listed Intel Xeon E processor models (2314, 2324g, 2334, 2336, 2356g, 2374g, 2378, or 2378g) regardless of BIOS version, and untrusted local users have elevated privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Intel-provided BIOS/firmware updates from the system manufacturer. Contact OEM vendors for patch availability and schedule firmware updates following vendor deployment procedures.
Contact Intel or your system OEM for the specific fixed BIOS/firmware release; Intel typically provides microcode/firmware updates through system vendors
- Check Intel's official security advisory for this vulnerability (INTEL-SA-00814 or similar) at www.intel.com for specific firmware version information
- Contact your Intel server/ workstation system vendor or OEM to obtain the latest BIOS/firmware update for your specific system
- Apply the vendor-provided BIOS/system firmware update that addresses this vulnerability
- Verify the firmware version has been updated after applying the patch
- Refer to Intel's security notice at security.netapp.com for any additional guidance on affected products
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38087 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38087 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data