Oaklouds PortalApplication · Hgiga

CVE-2022-38118

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-08-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.0-163 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OAKlouds Portal website’s Meeting Room has insufficient validation for user input. A remote attacker with general user privilege can perform SQL-injection to access, modify, delete database, perform system operations and disrupt service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in OAKlouds Portal's Meeting Room feature due to insufficient user input validation. A remote attacker with general user privileges can inject malicious SQL queries to access, modify, or delete database content, execute system operations, and disrupt service.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and use parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database interactions in the Meeting Room functionality to prevent SQL injection attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Oaklouds PortalApplication
Affected:>= 2.0, <= 2.0-163>= 3.0, <= 3.0-163

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Oaklouds Portal version
    Locate the version information for your Hgiga Oaklouds Portal installation through the admin interface, version file, or system documentation
    Affected if The installed version falls within 2.0 to 2.0-163 or 3.0 to 3.0-163 inclusive
  2. Verify Meeting Room feature is enabled
    Check the Oaklouds Portal admin panel or configuration to confirm the Meeting Room module is active
    Affected if The Meeting Room feature is enabled and accessible to general users
  3. Identify Meeting Room entry points
    Locate all URLs, endpoints, or API paths related to Meeting Room functionality in your web application
    Affected if The Meeting Room endpoints accept user-supplied input through query parameters, form fields, or request bodies
  4. Inspect input handling in Meeting Room
    Review the application code or intercept requests to the Meeting Room feature to identify where user input is passed to database queries
    Affected if User input from Meeting Room forms or parameters is used directly in SQL queries without apparent sanitization or parameterized query usage
  5. Review database logs for anomalous Meeting Room queries
    Examine database query logs or enable SQL query logging, focusing on requests from the Meeting Room feature for unusual or injected SQL syntax
    Affected if Database logs show SQL syntax or operators appearing in query parameters that differ from expected Meeting Room input patterns

You are affected if your Oaklouds Portal version is between 2.0 and 2.0-163 or between 3.0 and 3.0-163 AND the Meeting Room feature is enabled with user input being passed unsafely to database queries.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.0-163
Interim mitigation

Implement proper input validation and use parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database interactions in the Meeting Room functionality to prevent SQL injection attacks.

Fix this in Oaklouds Portal Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38118 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38118 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data