CVE-2022-38144
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in gVectors Team wpForo Forum plugin <= 2.0.5 at WordPress.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpForo Forum plugin versions 2.0.5 and earlier allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users by tricking them into visiting malicious pages or clicking links. The plugin fails to properly validate anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on state-changing operations, enabling attackers to execute forum actions like modifying settings, posts, or user permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify wpForo Forum plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and locate wpForo Forum in the list. Note its version number displayed beneath the plugin name.Affected if wpForo Forum plugin is not found or not installed, the vulnerability does not apply
-
Compare installed version to affected rangeCompare the installed version number against the affected range: versions 2.0.5 and earlier are vulnerable. The vulnerable versions are any release <= 2.0.5.Affected if Installed version is 2.0.5 or any earlier version number (e.g., 2.0.4, 2.0.3, 1.x.x)
-
Confirm plugin is active on the siteIn the WordPress Plugins list, verify that wpForo Forum shows as 'Active' rather than 'Inactive' or 'Must-Use'. Only active installations process the vulnerable state-changing operations.Affected if Plugin is active and the forum functionality is accessible to users or administrators
-
Determine if site accepts state-changing forum actionsCheck whether the forum allows authenticated users to perform actions such as creating or editing posts, modifying forum settings, or changing user permissions. These are the operations lacking proper nonce validation in affected versions.Affected if Forum functionality is enabled and users can perform modifications to posts, settings, or user permissions
If wpForo Forum plugin version 2.0.5 or earlier is installed and active on the WordPress site, the environment is affected by this CSRF vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate wpForo Forum plugin to version 2.0.6 or later which includes nonce validation. If immediate update is not possible, ensure WordPress admin sessions are not left active while browsing untrusted sites, and consider implementing additional server-side CSRF protections at the web server level.
Update to the latest version of wpForo Forum plugin available on wordpress.org (version 2.0.6 or higher, as the vulnerability was patched in version 2.0.6)
- Check the current version of the wpForo Forum plugin installed on your WordPress site
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard
- If the installed version is 2.0.5 or lower, update the plugin to the latest available version from the official WordPress plugin repository
- After updating, verify the plugin version in the admin dashboard to confirm the update was successful
- Test critical forum functionality (posting, replying, user registration) to ensure the update did not break existing functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38144 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38144 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data