ArcheryApplication · Archerydms

CVE-2022-38538

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-09-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.9.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Archery v1.7.0 to v1.8.5 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the checksum parameter in the report module.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in Archery v1.7.0 through v1.8.5 in the report module. The checksum parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries, allowing an attacker to inject malicious SQL code.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for the checksum parameter in the report module. Upgrade to a patched version if available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ArcheryApplication
Affected:>= 1.4.0, < 1.9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Archery version
    Run the command to check the installed version of Archerydms Archery (commonly: 'archery --version', check the package manager, or inspect the version file in the installation directory)
    Affected if The version returned is >= 1.4.0 and < 1.9.0, placing it within the affected range
  2. Locate the report module
    Identify if the report module is present in the Archery installation by examining the modules directory or the application's enabled features configuration
    Affected if The report module is present and enabled in the installation
  3. Verify checksum parameter handling
    Inspect the report module's source code or configuration files for how the 'checksum' parameter is processed, specifically looking for direct use in SQL queries without parameterized queries
    Affected if The checksum parameter is used directly in SQL queries without sanitization or parameterized queries
  4. Check for SQL injection vectors
    Review the application's request handling for the report module endpoint that accepts the checksum parameter, looking for unfiltered input being passed to database queries
    Affected if The checksum parameter value is passed directly to SQL queries without using prepared statements or proper sanitization

A user is affected if Archery version is between 1.4.0 and 1.8.5 inclusive, the report module is enabled, and the checksum parameter in the report module is handled without parameterized queries.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.9.0 or later
Fixed in 1.9.0
Interim mitigation

Implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for the checksum parameter in the report module. Upgrade to a patched version if available.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

1.9.0 or later

  1. 1. Backup the current Archery database and configuration files
  2. 2. Stop the Archery application service
  3. 3. Upgrade to version 1.9.0 or later (e.g., 1.9.0) using the project's upgrade method (typically pip install --upgrade archery or equivalent)
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade completed successfully
  5. 5. Restart the Archery application service
  6. 6. Test that the report module functions correctly with the checksum parameter
Caveat Review release notes for any configuration or API changes between your current version and 1.9.0

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Archery Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38538 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38538 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data