Digital ExperienceApplication · Hcltech

CVE-2022-38653

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-12-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In HCL Digital Experience, customized XSS payload can be constructed such that it is served in the application unencoded.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HCL Digital Experience contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability where customized payloads can be served unencoded to users. The application fails to properly sanitize or encode user-supplied input before reflecting it back in web pages, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in the context of the victim's browser.

MitigationImplement proper output encoding for all user-supplied data before rendering in HTML context, and validate/sanitize input at entry points to prevent XSS injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Digital ExperienceApplication
Affected:= 8.5= 9.0= 9.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify HCL Digital Experience installed version
    Locate the version information in the Digital Experience administration console under 'Version Details', or check the installation directory for version files such as 'wp.version' or 'HCL/DX/version.txt'. On Linux, also check /opt/HCL/DX/version.xml if installed via Hub. Alternatively, query the CX REST API endpoint /api/v1/system/version if exposed.
    Affected if The installed version is 8.5, 9.0, or 9.5 (exact matches as listed in affected versions)
  2. Confirm Digital Experience component versions
    Check the installed components via the WebSphere Application Server console (if using traditional WAS) or via the DX Maven repository metadata. Look for the core Digital Experience WAR files and their manifests indicating build numbers.
    Affected if Any core DX component matches version 8.5, 9.0, or 9.5 exactly
  3. Determine if custom portlets or themes are deployed
    Review the WebSphere/Portal XML access logs and the deployed WAR files in the wp_profile directory under PortalServer/config. Check for custom themes in the themes directory and custom portlet applications in the portletregistry database.
    Affected if Custom themes, portlets, or web content that accept user input are deployed on an affected DX version
  4. Inspect HTTP response encoding for user inputs
    Use browser developer tools or a proxy like Burp Suite to submit test input containing characters like <script>alert(1)</script> to any user-facing form (login, search, comment, profile fields). Inspect the HTTP response to see if these characters appear unencoded in the HTML source.
    Affected if User-supplied input is reflected in the response without HTML encoding (e.g., raw <script> tags visible in page source)

You are affected if HCL Digital Experience version 8.5, 9.0, or 9.5 is installed AND user-supplied input can be reflected in web pages without proper HTML encoding.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper output encoding for all user-supplied data before rendering in HTML context, and validate/sanitize input at entry points to prevent XSS injection.

Fix this in Digital Experience Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38653 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38653 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data