CVE-2022-38725
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn integer overflow in the RFC3164 parser in One Identity syslog-ng 3.0 through 3.37 allows remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service via crafted syslog input that is mishandled by the tcp or network function. syslog-ng Premium Edition 7.0.30 and syslog-ng Store Box 6.10.0 are also affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn integer overflow vulnerability exists in the RFC3164 parser of syslog-ng versions 3.0 through 3.37 (and Premium Edition 7.0.30, Store Box 6.10.0). Remote attackers can send specially crafted syslog messages via TCP or network functions that trigger the overflow, causing a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.38.1< 7.0.32< 6.0.5< 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the syslog-ng version installedRun 'syslog-ng --version' or check the package manager (e.g., 'dpkg -l syslog-ng', 'rpm -qi syslog-ng', or 'yum info syslog-ng')Affected if The installed version is below 3.38.1 for the open source edition, or below 7.0.32 for Premium Edition, or below 6.0.5/7.0 for Store Box versions
-
Locate the syslog-ng configuration fileCommon paths include /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf, /etc/syslog-ng.conf, or check syslog-ng startup scripts for the config file pathAffected if A configuration file exists and syslog-ng is running
-
Verify if RFC3164 parsing is enabledInspect the configuration file for 'parser' or '/rfc3164/' directives, or look for 'syslog' or 'network' source definitions that receive messagesAffected if The configuration includes RFC3164 parser modules or network-based message sources using the BSD syslog format
-
Confirm network-based syslog reception is activeCheck the configuration for 'source' blocks with TCP or UDP drivers (e.g., 'tcp()', 'udp()' in source definitions), or run 'netstat -tlnp | grep syslog' or 'ss -tlnp | grep syslog' to see listening portsAffected if syslog-ng is listening on TCP or UDP ports for incoming network messages
A user is affected if their syslog-ng version is below 3.38.1 (or below 7.0.32 for Premium Edition), AND the RFC3164 parser is enabled with network-based syslog message reception configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.38.16.0.57.0
Upgrade to a patched version of syslog-ng. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict or filter incoming syslog messages from untrusted sources at network boundaries.
syslog-ng 3.38.1+ / 7.0.32+; Syslog Ng Store Box 6.0.5+ / 7.0+
- Identify your current syslog-ng version using 'syslog-ng --version' or checking your package manager
- For syslog-ng 3.x users: Upgrade to version 3.38.1 or later
- For syslog-ng 7.x users: Upgrade to version 7.0.32 or later
- For Syslog Ng Store Box 6.x users: Upgrade to version 6.0.5 or later
- For Syslog Ng Store Box 7.x users: Upgrade to version 7.0 or later
- After upgrade, restart the syslog-ng service: 'systemctl restart syslog-ng' or 'service syslog-ng restart'
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version again
- Review syslog-ng configuration files to ensure compatibility with the new version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38725 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38725 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data