CVE-2022-38751
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUsing snakeYAML to parse untrusted YAML files may be vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks (DOS). If the parser is running on user supplied input, an attacker may supply content that causes the parser to crash by stackoverflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencesnakeYAML library does not properly limit recursion when parsing deeply nested YAML structures, allowing specially crafted YAML input to cause a stack overflow and crash the parser, resulting in denial of service for applications that parse untrusted YAML files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0< 1.31CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify snakeYAML library presenceSearch for snakeyaml JAR files in your application dependencies, build files (pom.xml, build.gradle), or application lib directories. Common paths include: Maven dependencies (~/.m2/repository/org/yaml/snakeyaml/), Gradle cache, or bundled in WEB-INF/lib for web applications.Affected if snakeYAML library is found in your application dependencies or runtime classpath
-
Determine installed snakeYAML versionCheck the version of snakeYAML in your dependency management. For Maven, inspect pom.xml or run 'mvn dependency:tree | grep snakeyaml'. For Gradle, check build.gradle or run 'gradle dependencies'. For runtime, the JAR filename often contains the version (e.g., snakeyaml-1.30.jar).Affected if The version is lower than 1.31, or the version cannot be determined and snakeYAML is present
-
Verify YAML parsing of untrusted inputReview application code to determine if YAML files are parsed from untrusted sources such as user uploads, external API requests, configuration files from untrusted locations, or network-based input.Affected if The application parses YAML input from untrusted or external sources without prior validation
-
Confirm lack of recursion depth limitsInspect YAML parser configuration for any limits on nesting depth. Check if the application sets PropertyBounds, Constructor limits, or uses SafeConstructor with restricted depth. Search code for 'depth', 'nesting', 'recursion' limits in YAML parsing configuration.Affected if No explicit depth or recursion limits are configured on the YAML parser, and the application processes deeply nested YAML structures
You are affected if snakeYAML version is below 1.31 AND your application parses untrusted or deeply nested YAML input without configured depth limits.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.31
Validate YAML input depth/length before parsing, implement resource limits on parsing operations, and upgrade snakeYAML to a patched version if available; consider sandboxing or isolating YAML parsing from critical code paths.
SnakeYAML version 1.31 or later
- 1. Identify all Java applications and dependencies that use the SnakeYAML library in your environment
- 2. For each project, locate the snakeyaml dependency in your build configuration (e.g., pom.xml for Maven, build.gradle for Gradle)
- 3. Update the SnakeYAML dependency version to 1.31 or later. For Maven, change the version in the dependency management section. For Gradle, update the version string
- 4. Rebuild and recompile all affected applications
- 5. Redeploy the updated applications to all environments
- 6. Verify that YAML parsing functionality continues to work correctly after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38751 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38751 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data