CVE-2022-38755
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Micro Focus Filr in versions prior to 4.3.1.1. The vulnerability could be exploited to allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to enumerate valid users of the system. Remote unauthenticated user enumeration. This issue affects: Micro Focus Filr versions prior to 4.3.1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMicro Focus Filr prior to version 4.3.1.1 contains a user enumeration vulnerability that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to determine valid usernames in the system. This is typically exploited by sending requests to authentication or user lookup endpoints and analyzing differences in responses (such as error messages, HTTP status codes, or response times) between valid and invalid usernames.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.3.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Filr versionAccess the Filr administration console or check the product version via the /about endpoint typically found at /ssf/about or via the admin UI. Alternatively, check system documentation or the software inventory.Affected if The installed version is lower than 4.3.1.1
-
Identify authentication endpointsLocate the login and user lookup endpoints exposed by Filr. Common paths include /ssf/login, /ssf/user/lookup, or similar REST API endpoints under the /ssf path.Affected if Authentication or user lookup endpoints are accessible without authentication
-
Test for user enumeration via login endpointSend HTTP POST requests to the login endpoint with known invalid usernames and compare the responses to requests with valid usernames. Look for differences in error messages, HTTP status codes, or response times.Affected if The system returns different error messages, status codes, or timing differences for valid versus invalid usernames
-
Test for user enumeration via user lookup endpointSend HTTP GET or POST requests to user lookup/search endpoints with various username inputs and analyze the responses for differences between existing and non-existing accounts.Affected if The system reveals whether a username exists through different error messages, response codes, or response content
-
Check network exposureVerify if the Filr web interface is exposed to the internet or untrusted networks. Review firewall rules and access controls to determine if unauthenticated attackers can reach the authentication endpoints.Affected if The Filr authentication endpoints are reachable from untrusted networks without authentication
The environment is affected if the installed Filr version is below 4.3.1.1 AND the authentication/user lookup endpoints are accessible and exhibit different responses for valid versus invalid usernames.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.3.1.1
Upgrade Micro Focus Filr to version 4.3.1.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
Filr 4.3.1.1 or later
- Verify current Filr version by accessing the Filr administrative interface or checking system documentation
- Schedule maintenance window for the upgrade process
- Back up the current Filr configuration and database according to Micro Focus backup procedures
- Download Filr version 4.3.1.1 or later from the Micro Focus software delivery platform
- Follow Micro Focus official upgrade documentation to apply the update
- After upgrade, verify the fix by attempting user enumeration to confirm the vulnerability is resolved
- Monitor system logs for any unusual authentication activity
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38755 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38755 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data