CVE-2022-38774
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in the quarantine feature of Elastic Endpoint Security and Elastic Endgame for Windows, which could allow unprivileged users to elevate their privileges to those of the LocalSystem account.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the quarantine feature of Elastic Endpoint Security and Elastic Endgame for Windows. The flaw allows unprivileged users to elevate their privileges to the LocalSystem account, giving them full administrative control over the affected Windows host.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.62.2< 7.17.7>= 8.0.0, < 8.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Elastic Endpoint Security or Elastic Endgame is installedOpen Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like '*Elastic*'}' in PowerShell to list installed Elastic productsAffected if Either Elastic Endpoint Security or Elastic Endgame appears in the installed programs list
-
Determine the installed version of the Elastic productRun 'Get-ItemProperty "C:\Program Files\Elastic\Endpoint\*\elastic-endpoint.exe' -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue | Select-Object VersionInfo' or check the version in the program's Properties window via Control Panel > Programs and FeaturesAffected if The version number matches the affected ranges: Endgame <= 3.62.2, or Endpoint Security < 7.17.7, or >= 8.0.0 and < 8.4.0
-
Confirm the quarantine feature is enabledCheck the Elastic Endpoint or Endgame configuration. In the Elastic Endpoint Security console, navigate to Policy > Malware Protection > Quarantine and verify if the quarantine setting is turned on, or inspect the endpoint configuration file for 'quarantine' settingsAffected if The quarantine feature is enabled in the security policy or configuration
-
Check for unprivileged user access to quarantine operationsReview Windows Event Logs under 'Application and Services Logs > Elastic' for quarantine-related events, and verify if non-admin users can access or trigger quarantine actions through the Elastic endpoint agentAffected if Unprivileged (non-Administrator) users have the ability to interact with or trigger quarantine operations
You are affected if Elastic Endpoint Security or Elastic Endgame is installed on Windows with a vulnerable version AND the quarantine feature is enabled and accessible to unprivileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.17.78.4.0
Apply available patches or updates from Elastic for the Endpoint Security and Endgame products. If a patch is not yet available, restrict access to the quarantine feature and monitor for suspicious activity using the remaining defensive capabilities.
Endgame: 3.62.3 or later | Endpoint Security: 7.17.7+ (7.x branch) or 8.4.0+ (8.x branch)
- Identify the currently installed version of Elastic Endgame or Endpoint Security by checking the software UI or using system inventory tools
- For Endgame users: Plan upgrade to version 3.62.3 or later
- For Endpoint Security users on 7.x branch: Plan upgrade to version 7.17.7 or later
- For Endpoint Security users on 8.x branch: Plan upgrade to version 8.4.0 or later
- Review Elastic's official upgrade documentation for the specific product version
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment to verify compatibility
- Schedule a maintenance window for the production upgrade
- Perform the upgrade following Elastic's documented upgrade procedures
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38774 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38774 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data