Smart EvisionApplication · Lcnet

CVE-2022-39030

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-09-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
smart eVision has inadequate authorization for system information query function. An unauthenticated remote attacker, who is not explicitly authorized to access the information, can access sensitive information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

smart eVision contains a system information query function that lacks proper authorization controls. An unauthenticated remote attacker can directly access this function to retrieve sensitive system information without any credentials or authentication.

MitigationImplement robust authorization checks requiring valid authentication before granting access to the system information query function. Ensure all sensitive endpoints enforce proper session validation and role-based access controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Smart EvisionApplication
Affected:= 2022.02.21

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed version of Lcnet Smart Evision
    Check the product version displayed in the application UI, startup logs, or installation metadata. Common locations include the About section, version info in the web interface, or the installed software inventory.
    Affected if The installed version is 2022.02.21 exactly, matching the affected version listed in the CVE.
  2. Locate the system information query function endpoint
    Identify if the application exposes a system information or diagnostics endpoint. This may be a web API endpoint, a specific URL path, or a function module. Check the application documentation or enumerate common paths like /system/info, /diagnostics, /api/system, or similar.
    Affected if The system information query function exists and is accessible via a network-exposed endpoint.
  3. Verify if the function is accessible without authentication
    Attempt to access the identified system information endpoint directly using a web browser, curl, or similar tool without providing any login credentials, session cookies, or authentication tokens.
    Affected if The endpoint returns system information without requiring any credentials or authentication, confirming the authorization bypass.
  4. Confirm the nature of exposed information
    Review the response from the unauthenticated access attempt to determine if sensitive system information is disclosed, such as server details, configuration, internal paths, or other potentially sensitive data.
    Affected if The response contains sensitive system information that should not be accessible to unauthenticated users.

You are affected if you are running Lcnet Smart Evision version 2022.02.21 AND the system information query function is network-accessible AND responds to unauthenticated requests with sensitive data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement robust authorization checks requiring valid authentication before granting access to the system information query function. Ensure all sensitive endpoints enforce proper session validation and role-based access controls.

Fix this in Smart Evision Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39030 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39030 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data