CVE-2022-39139
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V33.1 (All versions < V33.1.262), Parasolid V34.0 (All versions < V34.0.252), Parasolid V34.1 (All versions < V34.1.242), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.161), Simcenter Femap V2022.1 (All versions < V2022.1.3), Simcenter Femap V2022.2 (All versions < V2022.2.2). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing specially crafted X_T files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-17289)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability is a buffer overflow in Parasolid and Simcenter Femap when parsing X_T files. The application writes past the end of an allocated buffer during parsing of specially crafted files, allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2022.1, < 2022.1.3>= 2022.2, < 2022.2.2>= 33.1, < 33.1.262>= 34.0, < 34.0.252>= 34.1, < 34.1.242>= 35.0, < 35.0.161CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Simcenter Femap versionOpen Femap and go to Help > About, or check the installed programs list in Windows Control Panel. Note the full version number (e.g., 2022.1.0, 2022.2.1)Affected if Version is 2022.1.x where x < 3, OR version is 2022.2.x where x < 2 (for example, 2022.1.0 through 2022.1.2, or 2022.2.0 through 2022.2.1)
-
Check Parasolid versionParasolid version can be found in the software that bundles it (such as Siemens NX, Solid Edge, or Femap). Check the Parasolid version info in the application's About or license information, or look for Parasolid version in Windows Registry under HKLM\Software\UGS\ParasolidAffected if Version is 33.1.x where x < 262, OR 34.0.x where x < 252, OR 34.1.x where x < 242, OR 35.0.x where x < 161 (for example, 33.1.100 through 33.1.261)
-
Verify X_T file handling is in useCheck if the system or associated CAD/CAE applications regularly import or open .x_t (Parasolid tessellated) files. This is the attack vector for this buffer overflowAffected if The software is used to open X_T files from external or untrusted sources
You are affected if either Simcenter Femap or Parasolid is installed at a version within the vulnerable ranges AND the software is used to parse X_T files from potentially untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped33.1.26234.0.25234.1.242
Update to the vendor-supplied patched versions (V33.1.262, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, V35.0.161, V2022.1.3, V2022.2.2 or later). Avoid opening untrusted X_T files until patches are applied.
Simcenter Femap: upgrade to V2022.1.3 or V2022.2.2 | Parasolid: upgrade to V33.1.262, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, or V35.0.161 depending on your major version
- Obtain the fixed version of Simcenter Femap (V2022.1.3 or V2022.2.2) from the Siemens support portal or authorized distribution channel
- Obtain the fixed version of Parasolid corresponding to your major version: V33.1.262, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, or V35.0.161 from Siemens
- Ensure all instances of the affected software are closed before applying the update
- Install the updated version following standard Siemens installation procedures
- Restart the application after installation completes
- Verify the installed version matches the fixed release (2022.1.3 or higher for Femap 2022.1; 2022.2.2 or higher for Femap 2022.2; or respective Parasolid versions)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39139 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39139 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data