CVE-2022-39144
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V33.1 (All versions < V33.1.262), Parasolid V33.1 (All versions >= V33.1.262 < V33.1.263), Parasolid V34.0 (All versions < V34.0.252), Parasolid V34.1 (All versions < V34.1.242), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.161), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions >= V35.0.161 < V35.0.164), Simcenter Femap V2022.1 (All versions < V2022.1.3), Simcenter Femap V2022.2 (All versions < V2022.2.2). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing specially crafted X_T files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-17494)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in Parasolid CAD kernel and Simcenter Femap when parsing specially crafted X_T files, allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2022.1, < 2022.1.3>= 2022.2, < 2022.2.2>= 33.1, < 33.1.263>= 34.0, < 34.0.252>= 34.1, < 34.1.242>= 35.0, < 35.0.164CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Simcenter Femap versionOpen Simcenter Femap and navigate to Help > About, or check the installed version in Windows Programs and Features. Compare the version number to the affected ranges: >= 2022.1 but < 2022.1.3, or >= 2022.2 but < 2022.2.2.Affected if The installed Femap version falls within the affected ranges.
-
Check Parasolid kernel versionLocate the Parasolid installation (commonly in Program Files or within CAD applications that bundle it) and identify the version. This may be found in the Parasolid DLL properties, or within the application's documentation. Compare to the affected ranges: >= 33.1 < 33.1.263, >= 34.0 < 34.0.252, >= 34.1 < 34.1.242, or >= 35.0 < 35.0.164.Affected if The Parasolid kernel version is within any of the affected version ranges.
-
Verify X_T file parsing capabilityDetermine whether Simcenter Femap or any application using the affected Parasolid version is configured to import or open X_T files. Check file associations or import settings for .x_t file type support.Affected if X_T file parsing is enabled or available in the environment.
You are affected if either Simcenter Femap or Parasolid (standalone or embedded) is installed with a version matching the affected ranges and X_T file parsing functionality is present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped33.1.26334.0.25234.1.242
Upgrade to the patched Parasolid versions (V33.1.263, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, or V35.0.164) and Simcenter Femap versions (V2022.1.3 or V2022.2.2).
Simcenter Femap: V2022.1.3 or V2022.2.2; Parasolid: V33.1.263, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, or V35.0.164
- Identify the currently installed version of Simcenter Femap or Parasolid in your environment
- Navigate to the Siemens support portal (cert-portal.siemens.com) or official Siemens PLM downloads
- Download Simcenter Femap V2022.1.3 or later (V2022.2.2 or later) depending on your release branch
- If using Parasolid as a standalone component, download the corresponding fixed version: V33.1.263, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, or V35.0.164
- Apply the update by running the installer with appropriate administrative privileges
- Restart any running instances of the affected application
- Verify the installed version matches the fixed release by checking the application's About/Help section
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39144 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39144 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data