CVE-2022-39150
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V33.1 (All versions < V33.1.262), Parasolid V33.1 (All versions >= V33.1.262 < V33.1.263), Parasolid V34.0 (All versions < V34.0.252), Parasolid V34.1 (All versions < V34.1.242), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.161), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions >= V35.0.161 < V35.0.164), Simcenter Femap V2022.1 (All versions < V2022.1.3), Simcenter Femap V2022.2 (All versions < V2022.2.2). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing specially crafted X_T files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-17735)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in Parasolid and Simcenter Femap when parsing specially crafted X_T files. The application writes past the end of an allocated buffer during X_T file parsing, potentially allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2022.1, < 2022.1.3>= 2022.2, < 2022.2.2>= 33.1, < 33.1.263>= 34.0, < 34.0.252>= 34.1, < 34.1.242>= 35.0, < 35.0.164CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Simcenter Femap versionOpen Femap, go to Help > About or check the installation directory for version information. Compare the version number to the affected ranges: 2022.1.x where x < 3, or 2022.2.x where x < 2Affected if The installed version is 2022.1.0 through 2022.1.2, or 2022.2.0 through 2022.2.1
-
Check Parasolid library versionIf you have an application that embeds Parasolid, check the Parasolid library version file or the application About dialog which often lists included component versions. Compare against affected ranges: 33.1.x where x < 263, 34.0.x where x < 252, 34.1.x where x < 242, or 35.0.x where x < 164Affected if The Parasolid library version falls within any of these vulnerable ranges: 33.1.0-33.1.262, 34.0.0-34.0.251, 34.1.0-34.1.241, or 35.0.0-35.0.163
-
Determine X_T file parsing usageIdentify if your workflow involves opening or importing X_T (Parasolid Text) files in the affected software. Check recent file history or document templates for .x_t file extensionsAffected if The software is used to open X_T files from untrusted or external sources
You are affected if the installed Simcenter Femap or Parasolid version falls within the vulnerable version ranges AND you process X_T files with the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped33.1.26334.0.25234.1.242
Update to vendor-provided patched versions: Parasolid V33.1.263, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, V35.0.164 or later; Simcenter Femap V2022.1.3, V2022.2.2 or later. Avoid opening untrusted X_T files from untrusted sources until patches are applied.
Simcenter Femap 2022.1.3 or later / 2022.2.2 or later; Parasolid 33.1.263 / 34.0.252 / 34.1.242 / 35.0.164 or later
- 1. Identify the exact version of Simcenter Femap or Parasolid currently installed.
- 2. For Simcenter Femap: If running version 2022.1.x where x < 3, upgrade to version 2022.1.3 or later.
- 3. For Simcenter Femap: If running version 2022.2.x where x < 2, upgrade to version 2022.2.2 or later.
- 4. For Parasolid V33.1.x: Upgrade to version 33.1.263 or later.
- 5. For Parasolid V34.0.x: Upgrade to version 34.0.252 or later.
- 6. For Parasolid V34.1.x: Upgrade to version 34.1.242 or later.
- 7. For Parasolid V35.0.x: Upgrade to version 35.0.164 or later.
- 8. Obtain upgrades from the official Siemens support portal or through your existing licensing channel.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39150 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39150 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data