CVE-2022-39152
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V33.1 (All versions < V33.1.262), Parasolid V33.1 (All versions >= V33.1.262 < V33.1.263), Parasolid V34.0 (All versions < V34.0.252), Parasolid V34.1 (All versions < V34.1.242), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.161), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions >= V35.0.161 < V35.0.164), Simcenter Femap V2022.1 (All versions < V2022.1.3), Simcenter Femap V2022.2 (All versions < V2022.2.2). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing specially crafted X_T files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-17740)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in Parasolid and Simcenter Femap when parsing specially crafted X_T CAD files. The vulnerability allows an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process due to improper bounds checking during file parsing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2022.1, < 2022.1.3>= 2022.2, < 2022.2.2>= 33.1, < 33.1.263>= 34.0, < 34.0.252>= 34.1, < 34.1.242>= 35.0, < 35.0.164CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Simcenter Femap versionOpen Simcenter Femap, go to Help > About, or check the installation directory for version information. Look for the full version number (e.g., 2022.1.0, 2022.2.0)Affected if Version is 2022.1 through 2022.1.2, or 2022.2 through 2022.2.1 (falls within >=2022.1 <2022.1.3 or >=2022.2 <2022.2.2)
-
Check Parasolid versionCheck the Parasolid component version. If embedded in another Siemens product, look in the application's About or license information. For standalone Parasolid, check the installation or theXG file association.Affected if Version is 33.1.0 through 33.1.262, 34.0.0 through 34.0.251, 34.1.0 through 34.1.241, or 35.0.0 through 35.0.163 (falls within any of the four affected ranges)
-
Verify X_T file parsing is usedDetermine if the installation can or does process X_T CAD files. This is a native Parasolid format typically available in CAD applications using the Parasolid kernel.Affected if The product is used to open, import, or process X_T files, as this is the attack vector for the vulnerability
You are affected if Simcenter Femap or Parasolid with a version matching any of the affected ranges is installed and users process X_T CAD files with that software.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped33.1.26334.0.25234.1.242
Update affected Parasolid and Simcenter Femap installations to the patched versions specified (V33.1.263, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, V35.0.164, V2022.1.3, V2022.2.2) to remediate the vulnerability.
Simcenter Femap: upgrade to V2022.1.3 or V2022.2.2 | Parasolid: upgrade to V33.1.263, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, or V35.0.164
- Identify the currently installed version of Simcenter Femap or Parasolid by checking the application's About or version information
- Navigate to the Siemens official support portal (cert-portal.siemens.com) or Siemens Digital Industries Software download area
- For Simcenter Femap: Download version 2022.1.3 or 2022.2.2 (depending on your release branch)
- For Parasolid: Download the appropriate fixed version (V33.1.263, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, or V35.0.164) matching your current release line
- Close all applications that may be using the software
- Run the installer with administrator privileges and follow the on-screen prompts
- After installation, verify the updated version number matches the fixed release
- Test that X_T file parsing functionality works correctly with the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,288.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39152 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39152 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data