CVE-2022-39154
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in Parasolid V33.1 (All versions < V33.1.262), Parasolid V33.1 (All versions >= V33.1.262 < V33.1.263), Parasolid V34.0 (All versions < V34.0.252), Parasolid V34.1 (All versions < V34.1.242), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions < V35.0.161), Parasolid V35.0 (All versions >= V35.0.161 < V35.0.164), Simcenter Femap V2022.1 (All versions < V2022.1.3), Simcenter Femap V2022.2 (All versions < V2022.2.2). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing specially crafted X_T files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-18188)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in Parasolid and Simcenter Femap when parsing specially crafted X_T files. The application writes past the end of an allocated buffer due to insufficient bounds checking during X_T file parsing, allowing potential arbitrary code execution in the context of the current process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2022.1, < 2022.1.3>= 2022.2, < 2022.2.2>= 33.1, < 33.1.263>= 34.0, < 34.0.252>= 34.1, < 34.1.242>= 35.0, < 35.0.164CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Simcenter Femap versionCheck the application version through the executable properties (right-click on femap.exe, select Properties, look at Details tab) or by launching Femap and checking Help > AboutAffected if The version falls within >= 2022.1 and < 2022.1.3, or >= 2022.2 and < 2022.2.2
-
Identify installed Parasolid versionCheck the Parasolid component version through the library file (typically pxkernel.dll or similar Parasolid DLLs in the application directory) using file properties, or check the product version if Parasolid is a standalone installationAffected if The version falls within >= 33.1 and < 33.1.263, >= 34.0 and < 34.0.252, >= 34.1 and < 34.1.242, or >= 35.0 and < 35.0.164
-
Confirm X_T file parsing capabilityVerify the application has the ability to import X_T files by checking if the import functionality exists (File > Import or similar menu options in Simcenter Femap, or Parasolid-based application)Affected if The application can import or process X_T files and the version is within the affected ranges listed above
If either Simcenter Femap version 2022.1 through 2022.1.2 or 2022.2 through 2022.2.1 is installed, or any Parasolid version between 33.1-33.1.262, 34.0-34.0.251, 34.1-34.1.241, or 35.0-35.0.163 is in use, and the application processes X_T files, then the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped33.1.26334.0.25234.1.242
Update affected software to the patched versions: Parasolid V33.1.263, V34.0.252, V34.1.242, V35.0.164; Simcenter Femap V2022.1.3, V2022.2.2. Avoid opening untrusted X_T files until patches are applied.
Simcenter Femap: 2022.1.3 or 2022.2.2; Parasolid: 33.1.263, 34.0.252, 34.1.242, or 35.0.164
- Identify the current version of Simcenter Femap or Parasolid in use
- For Simcenter Femap: Upgrade to version 2022.1.3 or 2022.2.2 (whichever is applicable to your release line)
- For Parasolid: Upgrade to version 33.1.263, 34.0.252, 34.1.242, or 35.0.164 (whichever version line you are using)
- Obtain the updated version from the Siemens cert-portal or official Siemens support channels
- Apply the update following standard Siemens installation procedures
- Verify the version has been successfully updated after installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39154 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39154 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data