CVE-2022-39199
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedimmudb is a database with built-in cryptographic proof and verification. immudb client SDKs use server's UUID to distinguish between different server instance so that the client can connect to different immudb instances and keep the state for multiple servers. SDK does not validate this uuid and can accept any value reported by the server. A malicious server can change the reported UUID tricking the client to treat it as a different server thus accepting a state completely irrelevant to the one previously retrieved from the server. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.1. As a workaround, when initializing an immudb client object a custom state handler can be used to store the state. Providing custom implementation that ignores the server UUID can be used to ensure that even if the server changes the UUID, client will still consider it to be the same server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceimmudb client SDKs use the server's UUID to distinguish between different server instances for maintaining client state. The SDK does not validate the UUID received from the server and accepts any value reported. A malicious or compromised server can exploit this by changing its reported UUID, causing the client to treat it as a different server and accept state that is completely irrelevant to previously retrieved data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the immudb client SDK in useExamine your project dependencies or vendor libraries to determine which immudb client SDK you are using (e.g., immudb4j for Java, immudb-py for Python, immudb-go for Go, immudb-node for Node.js, or immudb-c for .NET)Affected if You are using any immudb client SDK library in your application
-
Determine the installed SDK versionRun the appropriate command to inspect the installed version of your immudb client SDK: for Python use 'pip show immudb-py' or check your requirements.txt; for Java check your pom.xml or build.gradle; for Go check go.mod; for Node.js check package.json; for .NET check your .csproj or packages.configAffected if The displayed version number is below 1.4.1
-
Verify UUID validation is not enforcedInspect the client initialization code to determine if the SDK has any built-in configuration to enforce or validate server UUID. Check the SDK documentation for any state handler options related to UUID validation or server identity verificationAffected if No UUID validation or server identity verification is configured and the SDK version is below 1.4.1
You are affected if your immudb client SDK version is below 1.4.1 and your application relies on the default state handler without custom UUID validation logic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.4.1
Upgrade immudb client SDKs to version 1.4.1 or later which contains the patch. Alternatively, implement a custom state handler that ignores the server UUID to ensure consistent state regardless of UUID changes.
1.4.1
- Identify the immudb version currently running using 'immudb version' or checking the deployment configuration
- Download immudb version 1.4.1 or later from the official GitHub releases (github.com/codenotary/immudb)
- Stop the currently running immudb service to prevent data corruption during upgrade
- Backup the immudb data directory to preserve existing data and state
- Install or replace the immudb binary with version 1.4.1
- Verify the installed version matches 1.4.1 using 'immudb version'
- Start the immudb service and verify normal operation
- If using immudb client SDKs, ensure client applications reconnect to verify the fix is effective
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39199 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data