CVE-2022-39378
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDiscourse is a platform for community discussion. Under certain conditions, a user badge may have been awarded based on a user's activity in a topic with restricted access. Before this vulnerability was disclosed, the topic title of the topic associated with the user badge may be viewed by any user. If there are sensitive information in the topic title, it will therefore have been exposed. This issue is patched in the latest stable, beta and tests-passed versions of Discourse. There are currently no known workarounds available.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Discourse allows any user to view topic titles associated with user badges, even when the topic has restricted access. This occurs because the badge awarding mechanism exposes topic titles to users who should not have access to view the restricted topic content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.8.9= 2.9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Discourse versionAccess the Discourse admin panel and navigate to /admin/about or run 'git log -1' in the Discourse installation directory to determine the exact versionAffected if The installed version is lower than 2.8.9 or equals exactly 2.9.0
-
Verify badge system is in useNavigate to the admin panel and check if any badges have been created or awarded by visiting /admin/badges. Also check if there are any badge-related topics in the systemAffected if Badges exist in the system and restricted topics could be associated with badge awards
-
Identify restricted or private topicsReview the topic list in /latest and check for categories with access restrictions (like 'private' or 'staff-only' categories). Look for topics in restricted categories that may have badge-related contentAffected if There are restricted topics in private categories that could expose their titles through the badge awarding mechanism
-
Check badge topic associationsExamine recent badge awards by querying the database or reviewing badge-related API endpoints. Badge awards that reference restricted topics would be visible to unauthorized users in the affected versionsAffected if Badge awards reference restricted topics and users outside the restricted group can view the badge award which exposes the topic title
You are affected if your Discourse version is below 2.8.9 or exactly 2.9.0 AND you have badges in use with restricted/private topics that could expose titles through the badge system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.8.9
Update Discourse to the latest stable, beta, or tests-passed version to patch this information disclosure vulnerability. There are no workarounds available.
latest stable version (after 2.9.0)
- 1. Back up your Discourse instance database and files before starting any upgrade
- 2. Ensure you have SSH access to the server hosting your Discourse installation
- 3. Navigate to your Discourse installation directory (typically /var/www/discourse)
- 4. Stop the Discourse application to prevent data inconsistencies during upgrade
- 5. Pull the latest Docker image for Discourse: run `./launcher rebuild app` or `git pull` followed by bundle install and rake db:migrate
- 6. After upgrade completes, verify the new version by checking Admin > Dashboard in Discourse
- 7. Confirm the badge functionality works correctly and restricted topic titles are no longer exposed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39378 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39378 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data