CVE-2022-39949
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper control of a resource through its lifetime vulnerability [CWE-664] in FortiEDR CollectorWindows 4.0.0 through 4.1, 5.0.0 through 5.0.3.751, 5.1.0 may allow a privileged user to terminate the FortiEDR processes with special tools and bypass the EDR protection.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFortiEDR Collector for Windows contains an improper control of resource lifetime (CWE-664) that allows a privileged user to terminate FortiEDR processes using special tools, effectively bypassing the EDR protection. This is a local attack requiring existing privileged access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0.0, <= 4.1.0>= 5.0.0, <= 5.0.3.751>= 5.1.0, <= 5.2.0.2288CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify FortiEDR Collector is installedOpen Windows Services (services.msc) or check Programs and Features for entries named 'FortiEDR' or 'Fortinet FortiEDR Collector'Affected if FortiEDR Collector is not found on the system, then this CVE does not apply
-
Identify the FortiEDR Collector serviceIn Windows Services, look for a service with 'FortiEDR' in the name (typically 'FortiEDR Collector' or similar) and note the service display name and statusAffected if No FortiEDR-related service exists on the system
-
Determine the installed FortiEDR Collector versionOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run: wmic product where "name like '%FortiEDR%'" get version, name OR check the executable file version in the FortiEDR installation directory (commonly in Program Files or Program Files x86)Affected if Cannot determine version - the system may still be vulnerable if FortiEDR is installed but version cannot be retrieved
-
Compare installed version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version falls within: 4.0.0 through 4.1.0, OR 5.0.0 through 5.0.3.751, OR 5.1.0 through 5.2.0.2288Affected if The installed version matches any of these three ranges, the system is affected by this vulnerability
The system is affected only if FortiEDR Collector for Windows is installed AND its version falls within one of the three affected version ranges (4.0.0-4.1.0, 5.0.0-5.0.3.751, or 5.1.0-5.2.0.2288).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Fortinet patched version (contact Fortinet for specific fixed releases) and restrict administrative privileges where possible to limit users who can terminate processes.
FortiEDR 4.1.1+ (for 4.x), 5.0.4+ (for 5.0.x), or 5.3.0+ (for 5.1.x/5.2.x)
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiEDR Collector version from the affected list (4.0.0-4.1.0, 5.0.0-5.0.3.751, or 5.1.0-5.2.0.2288)
- 2. Download the appropriate fixed version from Fortinet's FortiEDR support portal at fortinet.com/support or through your FortiCare contract
- 3. Upgrade FortiEDR Collector for Windows to version 4.1.1 or later (for 4.x branch), 5.0.4 or later (for 5.0.x branch), or 5.3.0 or later (for 5.1.x/5.2.x branch)
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the FortiEDR Collector version in the FortiEDR console
- 5. Confirm that FortiEDR processes are running and protection is active
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39949 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39949 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data