CVE-2022-39987
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Command injection vulnerability in RaspAP 2.8.0 thru 2.9.2 allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands as root via the "entity" POST parameters in /ajax/networking/get_wgkey.php.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability in RaspAP versions 2.8.0 through 2.9.2 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root via unsanitized 'entity' POST parameters in /ajax/networking/get_wgkey.php. User-supplied input is directly passed to shell execution functions without proper validation, enabling complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.8.0, <= 2.9.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RaspAP installation existsLook for RaspAP web files in common locations such as /var/www/html/raspap, /var/www/raspap, or the web root directory. Check for the presence of the /ajax/networking/ directory.Affected if RaspAP web files are found in the system
-
Identify installed RaspAP versionLocate and read the version file (commonly includes.php, config.php, or a dedicated version file in the RaspAP installation directory). Compare the version number to the affected range 2.8.0 - 2.9.2.Affected if Installed version falls within >= 2.8.0 and <= 2.9.2
-
Confirm vulnerable endpoint existsCheck for the existence of the file /ajax/networking/get_wgkey.php within the RaspAP web directory.Affected if The file get_wgkey.php exists in the expected location
-
Verify WireGuard feature is configuredCheck if WireGuard has been configured or enabled in RaspAP. Look for WireGuard-related configuration files, keys, or settings in the RaspAP config directory.Affected if WireGuard functionality has been set up in RaspAP
-
Assess authentication status for the endpointReview RaspAP authentication settings. Determine if the /ajax/networking/get_wgkey.php endpoint requires authentication or if authentication can be bypassed.Affected if Authentication is disabled, weak, or the endpoint is accessible without proper session validation
A user is affected if RaspAP is installed with a version between 2.8.0 and 2.9.2, the vulnerable get_wgkey.php file exists, WireGuard is configured, and the endpoint is accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a patched version of RaspAP. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to the affected endpoint via authentication and network controls, or temporarily disable the vulnerable functionality.
RaspAP version 2.9.3 or later (latest stable release)
- 1. Backup your current RaspAP configuration and data
- 2. Access your Raspberry Pi via SSH or terminal
- 3. Update the package list: sudo apt update
- 4. Upgrade RaspAP to the latest version by running: sudo apt upgrade raspap
- 5. Alternatively, manually update by cloning the latest release from the official GitHub repository
- 6. After upgrade, verify the get_wgkey.php file has been updated and no longer contains vulnerable code
- 7. Restart the web server: sudo systemctl restart lighttpd
- 8. Test that the application functions correctly with the new version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39987 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39987 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data