CVE-2022-40192
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpForo Forum plugin <= 2.0.9 on WordPress.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the wpForo Forum plugin for WordPress allows attackers to trick authenticated users into unknowingly submitting malicious requests to the forum, potentially performing unauthorized actions such as modifying forum content, changing user settings, or elevating privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify wpForo Forum plugin is installedLog into WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and look for 'wpForo Forum' or 'WpForo' in the list of active pluginsAffected if wpForo Forum appears in the plugins list and is activated
-
Check installed version numberIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, find wpForo Forum, and read the version number displayed below the plugin name. Alternatively, check /wp-content/plugins/wpforo/functions.php or the main plugin PHP file for 'Version:' in the file headerAffected if Version displayed is 2.0.9 or lower (any version <= 2.0.9)
-
Confirm vulnerable state-changing operations existThe vulnerability affects any wpForo form submission or AJAX action that modifies data (forum posts, user settings, membership changes). Check if the plugin has any active forms or AJAX endpoints by inspecting page source of wpForo pages and looking for form elements with action attributes pointing to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php or forum submission URLsAffected if wpForo is active and serving pages with forms or AJAX functionality without CSRF token validation (nonce fields)
-
Inspect form submissions for missing nonceView source of any wpForo page with a form (new topic, reply, user profile). Check if forms contain an input field with name containing 'nonce' or '_wpnonce'. If these fields are missing from state-changing forms, the vulnerability is presentAffected if Forms on wpForo pages lack nonce verification fields
A user is affected if wpForo Forum plugin is installed and active with version 2.0.9 or lower, and the plugin handles any user-submitted content or settings without CSRF token validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonce verification) on all state-changing form submissions and AJAX actions within the plugin, and add proper referer/Origin header validation on the server side.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-40192 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-40192 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data