CVE-2022-40227
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC HMI Comfort Panels (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V17 Update 4), SIMATIC HMI KTP Mobile Panels (All versions < V17 Update 4), SIMATIC HMI KTP1200 Basic (All versions < V17 Update 5), SIMATIC HMI KTP400 Basic (All versions < V17 Update 5), SIMATIC HMI KTP700 Basic (All versions < V17 Update 5), SIMATIC HMI KTP900 Basic (All versions < V17 Update 5), SIPLUS HMI KTP1200 BASIC (All versions < V17 Update 5), SIPLUS HMI KTP400 BASIC (All versions < V17 Update 5), SIPLUS HMI KTP700 BASIC (All versions < V17 Update 5), SIPLUS HMI KTP900 BASIC (All versions < V17 Update 5). Affected devices do not properly validate input sent to certain services over TCP. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a permanent denial of service condition (requiring a device reboot) by sending specially crafted TCP packets.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSIMATIC HMI panels fail to properly validate input on certain TCP services. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted TCP packets that cause a permanent denial of service, requiring a device reboot to recover.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 17.0= 17.0< 17.0= 17.0< 17.0= 17.0< 17.0= 17.0< 17.0= 17.0< 17.0= 17.0< 17.0= 17.0< 17.0= 17.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the HMI panel modelAccess the device through its web interface, TIA Portal project, or check the physical device label to determine the exact model (e.g., Simatic HMI Ktp700 Basic, Simatic HMI Comfort Panel, Siplus HMI Ktp400 Basic)Affected if The model matches one of the affected product families listed in the CVE
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device web interface, HMI runtime system information, or use Siemens TIA Portal to read the firmware version. Navigate to the device properties or system information screen showing the current firmware version.Affected if The firmware version is less than 17.0 or exactly version 17.0
-
Verify TCP services are enabled and accessibleCheck the device network configuration to determine which TCP services are enabled (such as HTTP, OPC, S7 communication, or other industrial protocols). Use network scanning tools or review the device configuration in TIA Portal to list active TCP listeners.Affected if Any TCP service is enabled and reachable over the network; the vulnerability affects 'certain TCP services' on the device
-
Assess network exposure of the HMI panelReview network architecture to determine if the HMI panel TCP services are accessible from untrusted networks. Check firewall rules, VLAN configuration, and direct IP connectivity to the device.Affected if The device TCP services are accessible from untrusted or external networks without proper network segmentation
You are affected if your HMI panel model is one of the listed products AND the firmware version is 17.0 or earlier, and the vulnerable TCP services are network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.0
Update affected HMI panels to V17 Update 4 or V17 Update 5 (depending on panel model) to patch the input validation vulnerability in TCP services.
V17 Update 4 (for Comfort/Mobile Panels) or V17 Update 5 (for Basic Panels)
- 1. Back up the current device configuration and project files to a secure location.
- 2. Download the firmware update from the Siemens Industry Online Support portal (cert-portal.siemens.com or siemens.com/productsupport).
- 3. For SIMATIC HMI Comfort Panels and SIPLUS variants (including KTP Mobile Panels): Upgrade to V17 Update 4 or later.
- 4. For SIMATIC HMI KTP1200 Basic, KTP400 Basic, KTP700 Basic, KTP900 Basic, and corresponding SIPLUS variants: Upgrade to V17 Update 5 or later.
- 5. Upload the firmware to the HMI device using TIA Portal or the device's web-based management interface, following Siemens update procedures.
- 6. After the update completes, verify the firmware version matches the target update version.
- 7. Restore the device configuration and verify normal operation.
- 8. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by reviewing the installed firmware version.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-40227 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-40227 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data