CVE-2022-41214
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDue to insufficient input validation, SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform allows an attacker with high level privileges to use a remote enabled function to delete a file which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation an attacker can completely compromise the integrity and availability of the application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInsufficient input validation in SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP and ABAP Platform allows attackers with high-level privileges to exploit a remote-enabled function module to delete files that should be restricted. This compromises system integrity and availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 700= 731= 740= 750= 789= 804CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP versionExecute the transaction code SM51 or use the SAP system information to display the installed release version. Alternatively, use transactioncode SPAM to check the kernel version and support package status.Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: 700, 731, 740, 750, 789, or 804.
-
Verify if RFC-enabled function modules are activeUse transaction code SE37 and search for function modules with 'RFC' in the attributes, or use transaction code SM59 to review configured RFC destinations. Check if remote-enabled function modules are present in the system.Affected if RFC-enabled function modules exist in the system and are accessible over network connections.
-
Review remote-enabled function modules with file operation capabilitiesUse transaction code SE37 to examine function modules that contain file-related operations such as 'DELETE', 'FILE', or 'DATASET' in their names. Check the module documentation and source code for file system access logic.Affected if Remote-enabled function modules with file deletion or file system manipulation capabilities are present and not properly protected.
-
Check authorization assignments for high-privilege usersUse transaction code SUIM to review user assignments to profiles with elevated privileges. Identify users who have both RFC access and authorization to execute file-handling function modules.Affected if Users with high-level privileges (such as SAP_ALL or administrative profiles) have RFC access to the system.
The environment is affected if the SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP version is 700, 731, 740, 750, 789, or 804 AND remote-enabled function modules with file operation capabilities are accessible to high-privilege users without proper input validation controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply SAP security patches for CVE-2022-41214 and review remote-enabled function modules for proper input validation controls to prevent unauthorized file system operations.
SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP 750 or higher (supported version with security note applied)
- 1. Review the SAP Security Note for CVE-2022-41214 in the SAP Support Portal (launchpad.support.sap.com) to obtain the specific patch number.
- 2. Identify your current SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP version by executing transaction SM51 or checking system overview.
- 3. Plan upgrade to a supported SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP version (750 or higher) that includes the security fix.
- 4. Schedule maintenance window for the upgrade following SAP upgrade guides.
- 5. Perform a full system backup before initiating the upgrade.
- 6. Execute the SAP system upgrade to the target supported version.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the security patch is applied by checking SAP Note in transaction SNOTE.
- 8. Validate the fix by confirming the vulnerable remote-enabled function module no longer allows unrestricted file deletion.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-41214 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-41214 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data