View26 Test ReportingApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2022-41244
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins View26 Test-Reporting Plugin 1.0.7 and earlier does not perform hostname validation when connecting to the configured View26 server that could be abused using a man-in-the-middle attack to intercept these connections.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins View26 Test-Reporting Plugin versions 1.0.7 and earlier fails to validate hostnames when establishing SSL/TLS connections to the View26 server, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept and manipulate traffic between Jenkins and the reporting server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
View26 Test ReportingApplication
<= 1.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify View26 Test-Reporting Plugin is installedNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'View26 Test-Reporting' in the list, or inspect the plugin directory $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/ for a directory named view26-test-reporting or similarAffected if Plugin is not present in the installed plugins list
-
Check installed plugin versionIn the Manage Plugins > Installed tab, find the View26 Test-Reporting Plugin and note the version number displayed in the 'Version' columnAffected if Version is 1.0.7 or earlier
-
Determine if plugin configuration existsNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Configure System and look for a View26 configuration section, or inspect $JENKINS_HOME/config.xml for View26-related configuration elementsAffected if A View26 server URL or endpoint is configured in Jenkins system configuration
User is affected if the View26 Test-Reporting Plugin version 1.0.7 or earlier is installed AND the plugin is configured with a View26 server URL, as only then will vulnerable SSL/TLS connections be attempted.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to View26 Test-Reporting Plugin version 1.0.8 or later which implements proper hostname validation, or ensure connections only occur over trusted networks.
Version 1.0.8 or later
- Navigate to the Jenkins plugin manager for your instance
- Locate the 'View26 Test-Reporting' plugin in the list of installed plugins
- Upgrade the plugin to the latest available version (version 1.0.8 or later)
- Restart Jenkins if required for the plugin update to take effect
- Verify the plugin shows the updated version in the plugin manager
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in View26 Test Reporting
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-41244 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-41244 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data