CVE-2022-41328
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory vulnerability ('path traversal') [CWE-22] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.9 and before 6.4.11 allows a privileged attacker to read and write files on the underlying Linux system via crafted CLI commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in FortiOS CLI allows privileged attackers to escape restricted directories and read/write arbitrary files on the underlying Linux system using crafted CLI commands. This affects versions 7.2.0-7.2.3, 7.0.0-7.0.9, and before 6.4.11.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.16>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.14>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.12>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.10>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiOS versionRun 'get system status' in the FortiOS CLI or check the FortiGate dashboard under System > Firmware. The output will show the current FortiOS version.Affected if The installed version falls within: 6.0.0-6.0.16, 6.2.0-6.2.13, 6.4.0-6.4.11, 7.0.0-7.0.9, or 7.2.0-7.2.3. Any of these ranges are vulnerable.
-
Confirm CLI access is enabledVerify that the FortiOS CLI interface is accessible via console, SSH, or the GUI CLI console widget. Check 'config system interface' and review which interfaces allow admin access.Affected if CLI access is enabled on any management interface (SSH, console, or GUI CLI) - the vulnerability is exploited through CLI commands.
-
Review admin account configurationList all admin accounts by running 'get system admin' in CLI. Identify accounts with 'super_admin' or 'admin' profile privileges.Affected if Any admin-level accounts exist - the vulnerability requires an authenticated attacker with privileged (admin) CLI access.
-
Audit CLI command logs for suspicious activityReview CLI audit logs via 'execute log filter category 23' (event logs) or check the Log & Report > Event Log section for CLI commands containing path traversal patterns such as '../', '..\', or commands targeting /etc, /var, or other system directories outside the FortiOS restricted shell.Affected if Recent CLI logs show commands with directory traversal sequences or unexpected file system access from non-default admin sessions.
You are affected if your FortiOS version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND CLI access with admin accounts is enabled, since exploitation requires authenticated CLI access with admin privileges to execute the path traversal.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.146.4.127.0.10
Upgrade FortiOS to version 7.2.4, 7.0.10, 6.4.11, or later to patch the vulnerability. Apply during a scheduled maintenance window with configuration backups.
Upgrade to FortiOS 6.4.12 or later, 7.0.10 or later, or 7.2.4 or later depending on your current branch
- 1. Identify the current FortiOS version by running 'get system status' in the FortiOS CLI
- 2. Based on your current version, plan the upgrade path to the fixed release
- 3. Before upgrading, backup the current FortiOS configuration using 'execute backup config tftp/ftp/sftp <config_name> <server>'
- 4. Review the FortiOS upgrade path matrix at fortiguard.com to ensure your hardware platform supports the target version
- 5. Download the firmware from Fortinet support portal or FortiGuard
- 6. Upload the firmware via FortiOS CLI: 'execute upload image <image_file>' or via Web UI under System > Firmware
- 7. Reboot the FortiGate device to apply the new firmware
- 8. After reboot, verify the new version with 'get system status' and confirm the fix is applied by testing the vulnerable functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,320.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-41328 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-41328 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data