CVE-2022-41399
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe optional Web Screens feature for Sage 300 through version 2022 uses a hard-coded 40-byte blowfish key ("PASS_KEY") to encrypt and decrypt the database connection string for the PORTAL database found in the "dbconfig.xml". This issue could allow attackers to obtain access to the SQL database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Sage 300 Web Screens feature uses a hard-coded 40-byte Blowfish key ('PASS_KEY') to encrypt and decrypt database connection strings stored in the dbconfig.xml file for the PORTAL database. An attacker with access to this configuration file can decrypt the credentials using the known static key, gaining unauthorized access to the SQL database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2022CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Sage 300 installation and versionOpen Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features, look for 'Sage 300' and note the installed version. The affected version is 2022 and earlier.Affected if The installed Sage 300 version is 2022 or earlier (any version up to and including 2022).
-
Locate the dbconfig.xml fileNavigate to the Sage 300 Web Screens installation directory, typically found in the 'Web' subfolder. Look for a file named 'dbconfig.xml' in the PORTAL or configuration directories.Affected if The dbconfig.xml file exists in the Sage 300 Web Screens installation directory.
-
Inspect dbconfig.xml for encrypted connection stringsOpen the dbconfig.xml file in a text editor. Look for XML elements containing encrypted or base64-encoded strings that represent database connection credentials (such as SQL Server connection strings with passwords).Affected if The dbconfig.xml file contains encrypted database connection strings, particularly for the PORTAL database.
-
Verify the Web Screens feature is in useCheck if the Sage 300 Web Screens component is enabled and configured. Look for IIS application pools or web services related to Sage 300 in Windows Services or IIS Manager.Affected if The Sage 300 Web Screens web component is installed and configured, making the dbconfig.xml file accessible.
You are affected if Sage 300 version 2022 or earlier is installed with the Web Screens feature enabled and a dbconfig.xml file containing encrypted database connection strings exists in the installation directory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReplace the hard-coded Blowfish key with a secure key management solution (e.g., hashicorp vault, Azure Key Vault, or encrypted environment variables), rotate all exposed database credentials, and restrict access to the dbconfig.xml file to prevent credential theft.
Sage 300 version 2023 or later (contact Sage for specific fixed release)
- Verify the current Sage 300 installation version and confirm the Web Screens feature is enabled
- Contact Sage technical support to confirm the availability of a patched release for version 2022 or later that addresses CVE-2022-41399
- If a patched version is available, obtain the update from Sage's official download portal or through your authorized Sage partner
- Before applying the update, perform a full backup of the Sage 300 database and configuration files, including the dbconfig.xml file
- Apply the Sage update following the official Sage upgrade documentation
- After updating, verify that the Web Screens feature no longer uses the hard-coded Blowfish key for database connection string encryption
- If a patched version is not yet available, review Sage knowledge base articles for any interim configuration mitigations or patches
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-41399 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-41399 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data