Mobile Security FrameworkApplication · Opensecurity

CVE-2022-41547

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-10-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.9.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) v0.9.2 and below was discovered to contain a local file inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in the StaticAnalyzer/views.py script. This vulnerability allows attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted HTTP request.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis
How this class of weakness works · CWE-98

A PHP include or require path is built from user-controlled input, so an attacker can steer it to a remote URL or an unintended local file — and because the target is then executed as code, this often becomes remote code execution. It is the classic remote/local file-inclusion trap. The fix is never to build include paths from input: map requests to a fixed allow-list of includable files.

General guidance for the php file inclusion (rfi/lfi) class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mobile Security FrameworkApplication
Affected:<= 0.9.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.9.2
Vendor patch github.com →
Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Version higher than 0.9.2 (e.g., 0.9.3 or latest stable release)

  1. 1. Identify the current MobSF installation version by checking the version file or running the version command
  2. 2. Backup the current MobSF installation including configuration and database
  3. 3. Upgrade to a version higher than 0.9.2 that includes the fix (commit b9cdd1f)
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
  5. 5. Test that the StaticAnalyzer functionality works correctly after upgrade
  6. 6. Confirm the file inclusion vulnerability is no longer present by attempting the previously vulnerable request pattern (should be rejected)
Caveat Minor upgrade - standard backup recommended but no major breaking changes expected for this security patch

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can identify the exact fixed release, upgrade, and verify it in staging — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-41547 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-41547 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data