CVE-2022-41553
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsertion of Sensitive Information into Temporary File vulnerability in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor on Linux (Analytics probe component), Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer on Linux (Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer probe component) allows local users to gain sensitive information. This issue affects Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor: from 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00; Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer: from 10.0.0-00 before 10.9.0-00.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA local information disclosure vulnerability exists in Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor and Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer probe components on Linux, where sensitive information is written to temporary files with insufficient access controls. Local users can read these temp files to obtain sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0-00, <= 4.4.0-00>= 10.0.0-00, < 10.9.0-00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor is installedRun 'rpm -qa | grep -i Hitachi' or 'dpkg -l | grep -i Hitachi' to list installed Hitachi packages. Look for package names containing 'Infrastructure Analytics Advisor' or 'HIAA'.Affected if The product is installed and its version falls between 2.0.0-00 and 4.4.0-00 inclusive.
-
Check if Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer is installedRun 'rpm -qa | grep -i Hitachi' or 'dpkg -l | grep -i Hitachi' to list installed Hitachi packages. Look for package names containing 'Ops Center Analyzer' or 'Analyzer' probe components.Affected if The product is installed and its version is 10.0.0-00 or higher but lower than 10.9.0-00.
-
Determine the exact installed version of Infrastructure Analytics AdvisorRun 'rpm -q' or 'dpkg -s' against the identified HIAA package name to retrieve the full version string (for example: 4.4.0-00). Compare this version to the affected range 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00.Affected if The version is 2.0.0-00 or higher and 4.4.0-00 or lower.
-
Determine the exact installed version of Ops Center AnalyzerRun 'rpm -q' or 'dpkg -s' against the identified Analyzer package name to retrieve the full version string. Compare this version to the affected range 10.0.0-00 through 10.8.x-x.Affected if The version is 10.0.0-00 or higher and lower than 10.9.0-00.
-
Inspect temporary file permissions (compensating control verification)Examine the /tmp directory and any application-specific temp directories used by the Hitachi products. Use 'ls -la /tmp' and check for files owned by the Hitachi application users with permissions more permissive than 600 (such as 644 or world-readable).Affected if Temporary files created by the Hitachi products are readable by other local users (permissions 644, 664, or world-readable).
A user is affected if either Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor version 2.0.0-00 through 4.4.0-00 or Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer version 10.0.0-00 through 10.8.x-x is installed on Linux, and temporary files with overly permissive permissions exist on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data10.9.0-00
Apply the vendor-provided patches to upgrade to version 4.4.0-01 or later for Hitachi Infrastructure Analytics Advisor, and version 10.9.0-00 or later for Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer. As a compensating control, restrict access to temporary directories and monitor for unauthorized file access.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-41553 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-41553 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data