CVE-2022-41832
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn BIG-IP versions 17.0.x before 17.0.0.1, 16.1.x before 16.1.3.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.6.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.5.1, and 13.1.x before 13.1.5.1, when a SIP profile is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed messages can cause an increase in memory resource utilization.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP where specially crafted SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) messages sent to a virtual server configured with a SIP profile cause excessive memory consumption, potentially leading to resource exhaustion and service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.5.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.6.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.5.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.6.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.5.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.6.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.5.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.6.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.5.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.6.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.5.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.6.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.5.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.6.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1>= 13.1.0, < 13.1.5.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.5.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.6.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.3.1>= 17.0.0, < 17.0.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' or 'tmsh list /sys version' to obtain the installed version.Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 13.1.0 to 13.1.5.0, 14.1.0 to 14.1.5.0, 15.1.0 to 15.1.6.0, 16.1.0 to 16.1.3.0, or 17.0.0 only.
-
Identify SIP profilesRun 'tmsh list /ltm profile sip' to list all SIP profiles configured on the system.Affected if Any SIP profile exists in the configuration.
-
Check virtual servers using SIP profileRun 'tmsh list /ltm virtual all one-line' and examine the output for 'profile sip' or SIP profile references in the virtual server definitions.Affected if Any virtual server references a SIP profile in its configuration.
-
Confirm vulnerability conditionCross-reference: if the BIG-IP version is in an affected range AND a virtual server has a SIP profile enabled, the system is vulnerable to the denial-of-service condition described in the CVE.Affected if Both conditions are true: (1) installed version is within affected ranges AND (2) at least one virtual server has a SIP profile configured.
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is within the vulnerable ranges AND you have a virtual server configured with a SIP profile that can receive specially crafted SIP messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped13.1.5.114.1.5.115.1.6.1
Upgrade BIG-IP to the patched versions (17.0.0.1, 16.1.3.1, 15.1.6.1, 14.1.5.1, or 13.1.5.1). If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling the SIP profile on virtual servers where not required or implementing upstream traffic filtering to limit SIP messages.
13.1.5.1, 14.1.5.1, 15.1.6.1, 16.1.3.1, or 17.0.0.1 (depending on current branch)
- 1. Identify the current BIG-IP version by checking the system information in the web management interface or running 'tmsh show sys version'
- 2. Identify which BIG-IP modules (APM, AFM, Analytics, AAM, ASM, DNS, FPS, GTM) are in use and have SIP profiles configured on virtual servers
- 3. Review the F5 knowledge article K23605446 at support.f5.com for detailed upgrade procedures and any additional prerequisites
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require system restart
- 5. Create a UCS backup of the current configuration using 'tmsh save sys ucs <filename>'
- 6. For BIG-IP 13.1.x: upgrade to 13.1.5.1 or later
- 7. For BIG-IP 14.1.x: upgrade to 14.1.5.1 or later
- 8. For BIG-IP 15.1.x: upgrade to 15.1.6.1 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-41832 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-41832 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data