Real Time Location System StudioApplication · Sewio

CVE-2022-41989

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-01-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.6.2 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Sewio’s Real-Time Location System (RTLS) Studio version 2.0.0 up to and including version 2.6.2 does not validate the length of RTLS report payloads during communication. This allows an attacker to send an exceedingly long payload, resulting in an out-of-bounds write to cause a denial-of-service condition or code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Sewio RTLS Studio fails to validate the length of incoming RTLS report payloads during network communication. Attackers can send crafted packets with excessively long data, triggering an out-of-bounds write condition that leads to denial of service or potentially remote code execution.

MitigationImplement strict length/bounds checking on all incoming RTLS report payloads before processing; validate payload size against expected maximum lengths and buffer allocations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Real Time Location System StudioApplication
Affected:>= 2.0.0., <= 2.6.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed RTLS Studio version
    Locate the Sewio RTLS Studio installation directory and check the version information, typically found in the application binary, installer logs, or version file within the program files folder
    Affected if The installed version falls within >= 2.0.0 and <= 2.6.2
  2. Confirm network listener service is active
    Check if the RTLS Studio network service or daemon is running and listening for incoming RTLS data packets on the configured network ports
    Affected if The network listener service is active and accepting connections
  3. Verify RTLS data input is enabled
    Inspect the RTLS Studio configuration to confirm that RTLS report reception from network sources is enabled, rather than operating in offline or file-only mode
    Affected if Network-based RTLS report ingestion is enabled in the configuration
  4. Check network exposure of RTLS ports
    Review network firewall rules or binding configuration to determine if RTLS Studio ports are exposed to untrusted network segments or the public internet
    Affected if RTLS network ports are accessible from untrusted network locations

The environment is affected if Sewio RTLS Studio version 2.0.0 through 2.6.2 is installed with network-based RTLS report reception enabled and accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.6.2
Interim mitigation

Implement strict length/bounds checking on all incoming RTLS report payloads before processing; validate payload size against expected maximum lengths and buffer allocations.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Sewio RTLS Studio version 2.6.3 or later (contact Sewio to confirm the exact fixed release)

  1. Check the current installed version of Sewio RTLS Studio
  2. Contact Sewio support directly to confirm the availability of version 2.6.3 or later which addresses CVE-2022-41989
  3. If available, obtain the upgrade package from official Sewio channels
  4. Backup the current RTLS Studio configuration and database before upgrading
  5. Follow Sewio's documented upgrade procedure to install the latest version
  6. After upgrade, verify that RTLS Studio services start successfully
  7. Test that RTLS report processing functions normally

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Real Time Location System Studio Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-41989 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-41989 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data