CVE-2022-42001
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in BlueSpiceBookshelf extension of BlueSpice allows user with regular account and edit permissions to inject arbitrary HTML into the book navigation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in BlueSpiceBookshelf extension where authenticated users with standard edit permissions can inject arbitrary HTML/script into book navigation. The malicious payload is stored and executed when other users view the affected book pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.1.0, < 4.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Hallowelt Bluespice versionAccess the Special:Version page in your MediaWiki installation (index.php?title=Special:Version) or check the version via command line if you have shell access. Locate the 'BlueSpice' entry and note the version number displayed.Affected if The installed version is 4.1.0 through 4.2.0 (inclusive). Versions below 4.1.0 or at/above 4.2.1 are not affected.
-
Verify BlueSpiceBookshelf extension is presentOn the Special:Version page, locate 'BlueSpiceBookshelf' in the extensions list. Alternatively, check your extensions directory for the BlueSpiceBookshelf folder and confirm it contains the extension.json or BlueSpiceBookshelf.php file.Affected if The BlueSpiceBookshelf extension is installed and listed on Special:Version.
-
Confirm book navigation functionality is in useNavigate to the Bookshelf manager (usually at Special:BookManager or look for the Bookshelf portal in the sidebar). Check if any books have been created with navigation enabled. Look for entries in the 'My Books' or 'Books' namespace.Affected if One or more books exist with navigation enabled in your BlueSpice installation.
-
Verify standard edit permissions existGo to Special:ListGroupRights or check your LocalSettings.php for user group permissions. Confirm that authenticated users (such as those in the 'user' group) have the 'edit' right granted.Affected if Standard authenticated users (not just administrators) have edit permissions enabled.
Your environment is affected if Bluespice version is 4.1.0 through 4.2.0, the BlueSpiceBookshelf extension is installed, books with navigation exist, and standard users have edit permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.2.1
Implement input validation and context-aware output encoding on all user-supplied content in the book navigation rendering pipeline to neutralize malicious scripts.
BlueSpice 4.2.1 or later
- Backup your BlueSpice installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade
- Verify your current BlueSpice version is within the affected range (>= 4.1.0 and < 4.2.1)
- Upgrade BlueSpice to version 4.2.1 or later following the standard upgrade procedure for your deployment method
- After upgrade, clear any caches to ensure the new version is fully loaded
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the BlueSpice version in the administration panel
- Test that the BlueSpiceBookshelf extension no longer allows arbitrary HTML injection in book navigation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-42001 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-42001 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data