CVE-2022-42132
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Test LDAP Users functionality in Liferay Portal 7.0.0 through 7.4.3.4, and Liferay DXP 7.0 fix pack 102 and earlier, 7.1 before fix pack 27, 7.2 before fix pack 17, 7.3 before update 4, and DXP 7.4 GA includes the LDAP credential in the page URL when paginating through the list of users, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers or attackers with access to the request logs to see the LDAP credential.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Test LDAP Users functionality in Liferay Portal and DXP embeds LDAP bind credentials in URL query parameters during pagination of user lists. This exposes sensitive authentication credentials through URLs that get logged in server access logs, browser history, and proxy logs, enabling credential harvesting by attackers with log access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 7.1= 7.2= 7.3= 7.4>= 7.0.0, < 7.4.3.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Lifter Portal/DXP versionCheck the deployed Lifer installation's version. This is typically visible in the Control Panel, in the product footer, or in the osgi/state directory. Compare against affected ranges: DXP 7.0-7.4 or Portal 7.0.0 to 7.4.3.4.Affected if The installed version falls within 7.0 through 7.4.4 (or below 7.4.3.5 for Portal)
-
Verify LDAP is configuredIn Lifer admin Control Panel, navigate to Configuration > Instance Settings > Authentication > LDAP. Check if any LDAP directories are enabled and connected.Affected if LDAP authentication or directory integration is enabled with at least one LDAP server configured
-
Confirm Test LDAP Users functionality existsLocate the Test LDAP Users feature in Lifer Control Panel under Configuration > LDAP. This feature is used to test LDAP user imports and displays results with pagination.Affected if The Test LDAP Users or LDAP Import test feature is present and accessible in the Control Panel
-
Audit server access logs for exposed credentialsReview HTTP access logs from the application server (Tomcat, WildFly, etc.), reverse proxy, or load balancer. Search for GET requests to LDAP test pages containing query parameters with values resembling passwords (base64 strings, special characters in URL parameters).Affected if Access logs contain URLs with LDAP bind credentials or sensitive parameters in the query string
Environment is affected if running a vulnerable Lifer version with LDAP enabled and the Test LDAP Users feature accessible, especially if URL logs show credential exposure.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.5
Upgrade to Lifer DXP 7.1 fix pack 27+, 7.2 fix pack 17+, 7.3 update 4+, 7.4.3.5+, or DXP 7.4 GA+. Additionally, audit request logs for exposed LDAP credentials and consider credential rotation as a precautionary measure.
LPortal 7.4.3.5+ or DXP fix pack 103+/27+/17+/update 4+ depending on version
- 1. Identify your current LPortal/DXP version and edition (Portal or DXP)
- 2. For LPortal 7.0.0-7.4.3.4: Upgrade to LPortal 7.4.3.5 or later
- 3. For DXP 7.0: Apply fix pack 103 or later
- 4. For DXP 7.1: Apply fix pack 27 or later
- 5. For DXP 7.2: Apply fix pack 17 or later
- 6. For DXP 7.3: Apply update 4 or later
- 7. After upgrade, verify the Test LDAP Users pagination no longer includes credentials in URLs
- 8. Review access logs to ensure no credentials were previously exposed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-42132 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-42132 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data