CVE-2022-42384
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of PDF-XChange Editor. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of U3D files. Crafted data in a U3D file can trigger a read past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-18653.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in PDF-XChange Editor's U3D file parser. The parser fails to properly validate buffer bounds when processing crafted U3D data, allowing a read past the end of an allocated buffer. While user interaction is required, this information disclosure can be chained with other vulnerabilities to achieve arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.5.366.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm PDF-XChange Editor is installedCheck for the application in Program Files (typically C:\Program Files\PDF-XChange Editor or C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF-XChange Editor) or search for 'PDF-XChange Editor' in the Windows Start menuAffected if PDF-XChange Editor is present on the system
-
Identify the installed versionRight-click the PDF-XChange Editor executable (pdfxcview.exe or PDFXEdit.exe), select Properties, and view the File Version on the Details tab. Alternatively, open the application and go to Help > About to display the version numberAffected if The displayed version is lower than 9.5.366.0
-
Determine if U3D file handling is enabledOpen PDF-XChange Editor, navigate to File > Preferences > Security (or Options > Security in older versions). Look for settings related to U3D, 3D content, or multimedia file handling. Check if these are set to allow or prompt rather than disabledAffected if U3D/3D content handling is enabled or set to allow automatic processing of U3D files
-
Inspect recent PDF files for embedded U3D contentOpen any recently viewed or downloaded PDF files in PDF-XChange Editor. Use File > Properties > Content or search for 'U3D' in the document structure to see if any PDFs contain embedded U3D objectsAffected if PDFs with embedded U3D content have been opened in the application
A user is affected if PDF-XChange Editor version 9.5.366.0 or higher is not installed AND U3D file handling is enabled, allowing specially crafted U3D files to trigger an out-of-bounds read when opened.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.5.366.0
Restrict or disable U3D file handling in PDF-XChange Editor until an official patch is available. Users should avoid opening U3D files from untrusted sources.
9.5.366.0 or later
- Check the current installed version of PDF-XChange Editor via Help > About
- Navigate to the official PDF-XChange website (www.tracker-software.com) and locate the download page for PDF-XChange Editor
- Download version 9.5.366.0 or later from the official source
- Close any running instances of PDF-XChange Editor
- Run the installer and follow the prompts to upgrade
- Verify the installed version is 9.5.366.0 or higher via Help > About after installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-42384 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-42384 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data