CVE-2022-42932
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMozilla developers Ashley Hale and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 105 and Firefox ESR 102.3. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 106, Firefox ESR < 102.4, and Thunderbird < 102.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory safety bugs in Firefox 105 and Firefox ESR 102.3 (also affecting Thunderbird) that demonstrate memory corruption vulnerabilities. The flaws could potentially be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution via heap corruption or use-after-free conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 106.0< 102.4< 102.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Mozilla productOn Windows, check Start menu for Firefox, Firefox ESR, or Thunderbird shortcuts. On macOS, check /Applications folder. On Linux, run: rpm -qa | grep -i mozilla or dpkg -l | grep -i thunderbirdAffected if Any of these three products (Firefox, Firefox ESR, or Thunderbird) is installed
-
Check Firefox versionOpen Firefox, go to Help > About Firefox (or navigate to about:support). The version number is displayed on this page. Alternatively, run: firefox --versionAffected if Version shown is 105.x or lower (< 106.0)
-
Check Firefox ESR versionOpen Firefox ESR, go to Help > About Firefox. The version will display as 'Firefox ESR XX.X'. Alternatively, run: firefox-esr --versionAffected if Version shown is 102.3.x or lower (< 102.4)
-
Check Thunderbird versionOpen Thunderbird, go to Help > About Thunderbird. Alternatively, run: thunderbird --version on Linux/macOSAffected if Version shown is 102.3.x or lower (< 102.4)
You are affected if any installed Mozilla product (Firefox < 106.0, Firefox ESR < 102.4, or Thunderbird < 102.4) matches the version ranges above.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped102.4106.0
Update to Firefox 106+, Firefox ESR 102.4+, or Thunderbird 102.4+ to patch the memory safety vulnerabilities. Deploy via enterprise patch management or end-user notification.
Firefox 106.0, Firefox ESR 102.4, Thunderbird 102.4
- Upgrade Firefox to version 106.0 or later
- Upgrade Firefox ESR to version 102.4 or later
- Upgrade Thunderbird to version 102.4 or later
- After upgrading, verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-42932 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-42932 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data