Kefactor EjbcaApplication · Keyfactor

CVE-2022-42954

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-11-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.10.0 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Keyfactor EJBCA before 7.10.0 allows XSS.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Keyfactor EJBCA before version 7.10.0 contains a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The specific location and attack vector are not detailed in the available description, but XSS vulnerabilities in EJBCA typically involve unsanitized user input being rendered in web interfaces related to certificate management or administrative panels.

MitigationUpgrade EJBCA to version 7.10.0 or later to obtain the vendor fix. Prior to upgrade, conduct thorough testing in a non-production environment given this is a PKI system.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Kefactor EjbcaApplication
Affected:< 7.10.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed EJBCA version
    Locate the EJBCA installation directory and check the version file or startup logs. Common locations include the manifest file, about page in the admin web interface, or the version reported by the EJBCA service/command-line tools.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 7.10.0 (for example, 7.9.x, 7.8.x, or earlier)
  2. Confirm EJBCA web interface is active
    Verify that the EJBCA admin or user web interface is deployed and accessible. Check if the application server (such as JBoss, WildFly, or Tomcat) is running and serving the EJBCA web applications.
    Affected if The web interface is publicly or internally accessible and the installed version is below 7.10.0
  3. Review web interface configuration
    Inspect the EJBCA web application configuration files (such as web.xml) and the application server configuration to confirm which web interfaces are enabled, particularly administrative panels and certificate management portals.
    Affected if Administrative or user-facing web interfaces are enabled and the installed version is below 7.10.0

You are affected if your EJBCA installation is version 7.9.x or earlier AND the EJBCA web interface (admin or user portal) is accessible, as the XSS vulnerability exists in these web components.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.10.0 or later
Fixed in 7.10.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade EJBCA to version 7.10.0 or later to obtain the vendor fix. Prior to upgrade, conduct thorough testing in a non-production environment given this is a PKI system.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Keyfactor EJBCA 7.10.0 or later

  1. 1. Back up the current EJBCA configuration and database before upgrading.
  2. 2. Download Keyfactor EJBCA version 7.10.0 or later from the official Keyfactor support portal.
  3. 3. Review the upgrade guide for migrating from your current version to 7.10.0.
  4. 4. Perform the upgrade in a staging or test environment first to validate functionality.
  5. 5. After successful testing, apply the upgrade to the production environment.
  6. 6. Verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing the previously vulnerable endpoints.
  7. 7. Monitor for any post-upgrade issues and have a rollback plan ready.
Caveat Review Keyfactor release notes for version 7.10.0 for any breaking changes or configuration changes required during upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Kefactor Ejbca Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-42954 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-42954 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data