Generic Webhook TriggerApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2022-43412

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-10-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.84.2 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin 1.84.1 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected webhook token are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook token.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin versions 1.84.1 and earlier uses a non-constant time comparison function when validating webhook tokens, enabling timing attacks that could allow attackers to deduce valid tokens through statistical analysis of response times.

MitigationUpgrade to Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin version 1.84.2 or later which implements constant-time comparison for token validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Generic Webhook TriggerApplication
Affected:< 1.84.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify the Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin is installed
    Access the Jenkins script console at /script or navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'Generic Webhook Trigger'
    Affected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
  2. Determine the installed version of the plugin
    In the Installed Plugins page, locate the Generic Webhook Trigger plugin and note the version number displayed in the 'Version' column
    Affected if The version listed is 1.84.1 or earlier
  3. Confirm webhook tokens are configured
    Navigate to a job configured with Generic Webhook Trigger, or check the plugin configuration at Manage Jenkins > Configure System > Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin, and look for any token fields or token configurations
    Affected if Webhook tokens are defined in job configurations or system settings
  4. Identify token validation endpoints in use
    Review the jobs using the Generic Webhook Trigger and identify which ones rely on token-based authentication for webhook triggers
    Affected if Jobs use the 'Token' field to secure webhook endpoints

You are affected if the installed Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin version is 1.84.1 or earlier AND you have configured webhook tokens for trigger authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.84.2 or later
Fixed in 1.84.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Jenkins Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin version 1.84.2 or later which implements constant-time comparison for token validation.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.84.2

  1. Log in to Jenkins as an administrator
  2. Navigate to 'Manage Jenkins' > 'Manage Plugins'
  3. Click on the 'Updates' tab
  4. Locate 'Generic Webhook Trigger Plugin' in the list
  5. If version 1.84.2 or later is available, select the plugin and click 'Download now and install after restart'
  6. Alternatively, go to the 'Available' tab, search for 'Generic Webhook Trigger', and install or update to version 1.84.2
  7. After installation, restart Jenkins to apply the update
  8. Verify the plugin version shows 1.84.2 or later in 'Manage Plugins' > 'Installed' tab

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Generic Webhook Trigger Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43412 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43412 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data