OpenharmonyApplication

CVE-2022-43451

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-11-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OpenHarmony-v3.1.2 and prior versions had an Multiple path traversal vulnerability in appspawn and nwebspawn services. Local attackers can create arbitrary directories or escape application sandbox.If chained with other vulnerabilities it would allow an unprivileged process to gain full root privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenHarmony v3.1.2 and prior versions contain a path traversal vulnerability in the appspawn and nwebspawn services. Local attackers can exploit this to create arbitrary directories on the system or escape application sandbox restrictions. When combined with other vulnerabilities, this can enable an unprivileged process to escalate to full root privileges.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of OpenHarmony beyond v3.1.2. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement input validation and sanitization on file path operations within appspawn and nwebspawn services to prevent directory traversal attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenharmonyApplication
Affected:>= 3.1, <= 3.1.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OpenHarmony version
    Check the system version file or use the 'getprop' command if available (e.g., 'getprop ro.build.version.sdk' or check /etc/version). For embedded devices, check /vendor or /system/build.prop for 'ro.build.version.release' or similar version properties.
    Affected if The installed version is >= 3.1.0 and <= 3.1.2 (including any point releases within this range)
  2. Locate appspawn service
    Search for the appspawn binary or service. Check common locations such as /system/bin/, /vendor/bin/, or use 'find / -name appspawn 2>/dev/null'. If using systemd, run 'systemctl list-units --all | grep appspawn' or check /etc/systemd/system/ for service files.
    Affected if The appspawn binary or service file exists on the system within the affected version range
  3. Locate nwebspawn service
    Search for the nwebspawn binary or service. Check common locations such as /system/bin/, /vendor/bin/, or use 'find / -name nwebspawn 2>/dev/null'. If using systemd, run 'systemctl list-units --all | grep nwebspawn' or check /etc/systemd/system/ for service files.
    Affected if The nwebspawn binary or service file exists on the system within the affected version range
  4. Verify service status if found
    If the binaries or services are found, check their running status. For systemd: 'systemctl status appspawn' and 'systemctl status nwebspawn'. For init scripts: check running processes with 'ps aux | grep -E "appspawn|nwebspawn"'.
    Affected if Either the appspawn or nwebspawn service is currently running or enabled on the system

The system is affected if OpenHarmony version is 3.1, 3.1.1, or 3.1.2 AND the appspawn or nwebspawn service is present on the device.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.1.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of OpenHarmony beyond v3.1.2. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement input validation and sanitization on file path operations within appspawn and nwebspawn services to prevent directory traversal attacks.

Fix this in Openharmony Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43451 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43451 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data