Vbase Automation BaseApplication · Visam

CVE-2022-43512

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-03-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 11.7.5 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Versions of VISAM VBASE Automation Base prior to 11.7.5 may disclose information if a valid user opens a specially crafted file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

VISAM VBASE Automation Base versions prior to 11.7.5 contain an information disclosure vulnerability where a specially crafted file, when opened by a valid authenticated user, can expose sensitive information. The attack requires user interaction (opening the malicious file) and valid credentials, suggesting a file parsing or processing vulnerability.

MitigationUpgrade VISAM VBASE Automation Base to version 11.7.5 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Vbase Automation BaseApplication
Affected:< 11.7.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm VISAM VBASE Automation Base installation
    Check for VISAM VBASE Automation Base in installed programs or look for VBASE-related processes/services on the system
    Affected if VISAM VBASE Automation Base is present on the system
  2. Identify installed VBASE version
    Use the product's built-in about dialog, check Windows Add/Remove Programs, or look for version information in the VBASE installation directory (such as a version file or executable properties)
    Affected if The installed version is found to be less than 11.7.5
  3. Verify authentication configuration
    Check if user authentication is enabled and configured for VBASE (examine user management settings or authentication-related configuration files in the VBASE directory)
    Affected if Valid user credentials are required to access VBASE, which is the expected configuration for this vulnerability to be exploitable
  4. Review recent file access logs
    Examine VBASE audit logs or system event logs for any recently opened files that may have been specially crafted, looking for unexpected information disclosure events
    Affected if Suspicious file operations or information disclosure events are observed in logs

The environment is affected if VISAM VBASE Automation Base is installed with a version lower than 11.7.5 and users have valid credentials to access the application.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 11.7.5 or later
Fixed in 11.7.5
Interim mitigation

Upgrade VISAM VBASE Automation Base to version 11.7.5 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

VISAM VBASE Automation Base 11.7.5

  1. Verify current installation version of VISAM VBASE Automation Base
  2. Download VISAM VBASE Automation Base version 11.7.5 or later from the official vendor source
  3. Create a full backup of the current VBASE configuration and database
  4. Stop all VBASE services and processes
  5. Install version 11.7.5 following standard vendor upgrade procedures
  6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
  7. Restart VBASE services
  8. Validate that normal operations function correctly after upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Vbase Automation Base Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43512 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43512 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data