CVE-2022-43681
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn out-of-bounds read exists in the BGP daemon of FRRouting FRR through 8.4. When sending a malformed BGP OPEN message that ends with the option length octet (or the option length word, in case of an extended OPEN message), the FRR code reads of out of the bounds of the packet, throwing a SIGABRT signal and exiting. This results in a bgpd daemon restart, causing a Denial-of-Service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in the BGP daemon (bgpd) of FRRouting through version 8.4. When processing a malformed BGP OPEN message that ends with an option length octet (or option length word for extended OPEN messages), the code reads beyond the bounds of the packet buffer. This causes a SIGABRT signal and daemon exit, triggering an automatic restart and resulting in a Denial-of-Service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0= 11.0= 12.0<= 8.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if FRRouting bgpd is installedRun 'dpkg -l | grep frr' on Debian or check for /usr/sbin/bgpd binary with 'which bgpd'Affected if FRRouting package or bgpd binary is found on the system
-
Identify installed FRRouting versionRun 'dpkg -l frr' or 'frr --version' to obtain the exact version numberAffected if Version is 8.4 or lower, or version cannot be determined (indicating very old installation)
-
Verify bgpd daemon is runningRun 'systemctl status bgpd' or check process list with 'ps aux | grep bgpd'Affected if bgpd process is actively running
-
Confirm BGP peerings are configuredCheck for BGP configuration in /etc/frr/bgpd.conf or run 'vtysh -c "show ip bgp summary"' to list configured peersAffected if BGP neighbors or peers are configured, meaning the daemon accepts incoming BGP connections
If FRRouting version 8.4 or lower is installed, bgpd is running, and BGP peers are configured, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2022-43681.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade FRRouting to a version beyond 8.4 that contains the fix for proper bounds checking. Additionally, implement BGP session authentication (MD5 or TCP-AO) and network-level controls to limit which peers can send BGP messages to reduce attack surface.
FRRouting 8.5 or later (for Debian systems, use backports or compile from source if fixed version not yet in stable repos)
- 1. Identify the current FRRouting package version installed on the system using: dpkg -l | grep frr or apt list --installed | grep frr
- 2. For Debian 10 (Buster), Debian 11 (Bullseye), and Debian 12 (Bookworm), update the package repository metadata: apt update
- 3. Upgrade FRRouting to the latest available version in the Debian repositories: apt install frr
- 4. Verify the installed version after upgrade: dpkg -l | grep frr
- 5. If the installed version is still <= 8.4, consider using backports repository for Debian 10/11, or wait for security updates, or compile FRR from source obtaining version 8.5 or later from the official FRR project (https://github.com/FRRouting/frr)
- 6. After upgrade, restart the bgpd service to apply changes: systemctl restart bgpd
- 7. Verify the BGP daemon is running properly: systemctl status bgpd
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43681 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43681 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data