CVE-2022-43702
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen the directory containing the installer does not have sufficiently restrictive file permissions, an attacker can modify (or replace) the installer to execute malicious code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability exists because the directory containing an installer lacks sufficiently restrictive file permissions, allowing an attacker to modify or replace the installer file before or during execution. This enables arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user running the installer.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.00, <= 5.06>= 6.00, < 6.18= 6.16>= 6.6, < 6.6.5all versions>= 5.0.0, <= 5.29.3all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Arm product and versionCheck the installed version by examining product-specific metadata. For Arm Compiler, look in the installation directory for a version file or check registry entries. For Development Studio, check the 'sw/mappings' or 'bin' directories for version information, or use 'armds_version.sh' if available.Affected if The installed version falls within: Arm Compiler 5.00-5.06 or 6.00-6.17.x; Arm Compiler For Embedded Fusa 6.16; Arm Compiler For Functional Safety 6.6 to 6.6.4; Development Studio 5.0.0-5.29.3; or any version of Arm Development Studio or Fast Models.
-
Locate the installer directoryIdentify the directory where the installer files are stored or were extracted. This is typically the original installation source location, such as '/opt/arm', 'C:\Program Files\Arm', or a downloads folder. Check both the current installation path and any cached installer locations.Affected if The installer directory exists and contains installer files (.exe, .msi, .sh, or installation bundles) from the affected Arm products.
-
Check directory permissions for write accessOn Linux/Unix: use 'ls -ld <directory>' to view permissions. On Windows: right-click the directory, go to Properties > Security, or use 'icacls <directory>' command. Examine whether unauthorized users or groups have Write or Modify permissions.Affected if The directory grants Write or Modify permissions to non-privileged users, groups, or 'Everyone'. Permissions less restrictive than 755 (owner read/write/execute only, others read/execute) on Unix-like systems indicate the vulnerability is present.
-
Verify installer file integrityCompare the current installer files with their original checksums if available. Check file modification timestamps to see if files were modified after the original installation date. Look for unexpected files or scripts in the installer directory.Affected if Installer files show unexpected modifications, have incorrect timestamps compared to the installation date, or contain extra/unknown files that may indicate tampering.
A defender is affected if they have any of the listed Arm products installed AND the directory containing their installer files grants write access to unauthorized users, allowing potential tampering before or during installation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data6.6.56.18
Apply restrictive file permissions (e.g., 755 or more restrictive) to directories containing installers and ensure they are protected from unauthorized write access.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43702 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43702 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data