CVE-2022-43751
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMcAfee Total Protection prior to version 16.0.49 contains an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability due to the use of a variable pointing to a subdirectory that may be controllable by an unprivileged user. This may have allowed the unprivileged user to execute arbitrary code with system privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMcAfee Total Protection prior to version 16.0.49 contains an uncontrolled search path element vulnerability where the application uses a variable pointing to a subdirectory that can be controlled by an unprivileged user. This allows privilege escalation, enabling a low-privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code with system-level privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.0.49CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify McAfee Total Protection is installedCheck for McAfee Total Protection in the Windows installed programs list via Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run: Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Product | Where-Object {$_.Name -like '*McAfee*Total*Protection*'}Affected if McAfee Total Protection appears in the installed programs list
-
Determine the installed versionOpen the McAfee Total Protection interface and navigate to About/Account, or check the registry key: HKLM\SOFTWARE\McAfee\Inc. (or check the version in Programs and Features)Affected if The displayed version is lower than 16.0.49 (e.g., 16.0.48, 16.0.x, or any version prior to 16.0.49)
-
Identify directories McAfee Total Protection accesses at runtimeMonitor the application using Process Monitor (ProcMon) while McAfee Total Protection is running, filtering by the mctray.exe or mcui32.exe process name to see which paths the application reads from or executes fromAffected if Any path accessed by the application points to a directory that non-admin users can write to (such as user profile folders, temp directories, or writable network shares)
-
Check for writable subdirectories in the McAfee installation folderInspect the McAfee installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\McAfee\ or C:\Program Files\Common Files\McAfee\) and subdirectories for permissions that allow standard users to write files. Use: icacls 'C:\Program Files\McAfee\' /tAffected if Any subdirectory within the McAfee installation path grants write or modify permissions to Users orAuthenticated Users groups
You are affected if McAfee Total Protection is installed with a version prior to 16.0.49 AND any application directory or runtime path is writable by low-privileged users, as this enables the uncontrolled search path exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.0.49
Upgrade McAfee Total Protection to version 16.0.49 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
McAfee Total Protection version 16.0.49 or later
- Verify the current installed version of McAfee Total Protection on the affected system
- Ensure you have administrator privileges on the system before attempting the upgrade
- Download McAfee Total Protection version 16.0.49 or later from the official McAfee download center (mcafee.com) or your organization's software distribution point
- Close any running instances of McAfee Total Protection or related McAfee processes
- Run the installer for the new version (16.0.49 or later) with administrative privileges
- Follow the on-screen installation prompts to complete the upgrade
- Restart the system if prompted by the installer
- After installation, verify that the new version (16.0.49 or later) is installed by checking the product version in About or Add/Remove Programs
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43751 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43751 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data